Tag Archives: clear
Burning Issues: Is Biomass A Viable Energy Alternative?
by Kim Bryan 24 June 2013 It is clear that for biomass to be part of a zero-carbon energy future, strict safeguards need to be in place to ensure that only sustainable sourcing occurs. Kim Bryan Can biomass help meet the UK’s energy demands? The Centre for Alternative Technology ’s Kim Bryan investigates… As the world’s supply of fossil fuels dwindles, the search for alternative energy sources is vital. Biomass is one such energy source that is being touted as a good alternative to conventional fossil fuels. However, it is not without considerable opposition from those who argue that biomass could do more harm than good in the battle to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass is energy created from the burning of biological materials such as plants and non-living things such as biodegradable waste. Anything that is alive or was alive a short time ago can be categorised under biomass, therefore trees, crops, animal and plant waste are all included. The attraction of biomass in the fight against climate change is that it is carbon neutral. Unlike the fossil fuels, oil, gas and coal, which when burnt add to the net amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the CO 2 that biomass produces when ignited is absorbed from the atmosphere by the crops used to make it, and so the net atmospheric amount is not increased. Currently in the UK there are 20 dedicated biomass power plants that are producing a total of 1,092MW from a variety of sources including poultry waste and woody biomass. There are around another 30 at planning stage with a combined capacity of 5,000MW. Given that 1MW can sustain 1,000 homes for an hour, that is a significant contribution to the UK energy mix. However like many energy sources, it is also controversial, as there are both advantages and disadvantages. Potential impacts of biomass In recent years numerous organisations have issued warnings about the potential impacts of the mass production of biomass. UK-based organisation Biofuelwatch is currently protesting against plans by Drax power station in Yorkshire to convert half of their coal-fired power station to run on biomass. Whilst in practice this sounds like a green idea, “highly biodiverse forests in North America are already being clear cut to make wood pellets for UK power stations. This will only get worse as the industry expands.” Biofuelwatch say that communities in South Africa are already losing access to land and water because biodiverse grasslands are being destroyed for monoculture tree plantations, some of which supply Drax. Drax has the capability to produce 12.5 per cent of its output from renewable and sustainable biomass – the equivalent output of over 700 wind turbines. Drax says that ‘burning biomass at this level saves over two and a half million tonnes of CO 2 each year.’ Wood has always served as a fuel source for fires and ovens; however, technological advances mean that burning biomass can produce energy for everything from a power plant to an engine. Advantages The advantages are that burning biomass is said to be carbon neutral, in that by growing and then burning it there is no creation of additional carbon monoxide. Biomass products are abundant and renewable; since they come from living sources and life is cyclical, these products potentially never run out, so long as there is something living on earth and someone is there to turn that living thing’s components and waste products into energy. Another benefit of biomass is that we can use waste and thus reduce landfill to produce energy. However there are concerns that incinerating household waste depresses recycling and wastes resources, releases greenhouse gasses, and is often forced through against strong public opposition. Instead of promoting zero waste, incinerators rely on material for feedstock that should be recycled or composted. Incinerators create toxic emissions and hazardous ash, and therefore pose significant health risks. ‘Strict safeguards need to be in place’ It is clear that for biomass to be part of a zero-carbon energy future, strict safeguards need to be in place to ensure that only sustainable sourcing occurs. Otherwise, as the Centre for Alternative Technology’s Freya Stanley-Price points out: “We are getting rid of one environmental problem and replacing it with another.” Friends of the Earth suggest a number of measures that include keeping the scale of biomass to the size of domestically available resources, using anaerobic digestion for the treatment of food and animal waste and focusing biomass use close to production. In addition, there must be a joined-up, integrated approach to energy planning that considers the most efficient use of any energy generated and looks forward to managing energy demand. “There are many things that have to be carefully considered and weighed when determining if biomass energy is a viable alternative energy source,” Stanley-Price says. “In a zero-carbon future we must make sustainable use of trees as fuel, and replant them as we harvest them – creating a continuous carbon cycle. Growing our own fuel also creates jobs and is ideal for strong, local economies.” Kim Bryan Media Officer Centre for Alternative Technology www.cat.org.uk [This article was originally published on 10 th June 2013 as part of Science Omega Review UK 02] Read more: http://www.scienceom…s#ixzz2XEj6LkRu Continue reading
US Farmland Price Rally In ‘Clear’ Slowdown
The rally in US farmland prices is in a “clear” slowdown which has already seen prices fall in some leading agricultural states, a leading farm economist said, warning of a dent to values from falling crop prices. Farmland prices continue to rise, with a monthly market index figure coming in at 58.4, well above the 50.0 stagnation level, above which it has stood since February 2010, a Creighton University survey of lenders showed. However, this represented a fall from the 62.1 the May figure, and was the sixth month-on-month decline out of the last seven readings. And the overall rise concealed declines in prices including Iowa, the top-ranked producing state for both corn and soybeans, second-ranked Illinois and Kansas, the biggest US wheat-growing state. ‘Clear downward trend’ “We are tracking a clear downward trend in farmland price growth,” Creighton University economist Ernie Goss said, blaming the prospect of far lower prices for this year’s US crops than the 2012 harvest/ “This downward trend in agriculture commodity prices has softened the growth in both farmland prices and farm equipment sales.” Professor Goss added: “I expect that growth to continue to fall as the US dollar strengthens and agriculture commodity prices weaken.” A strengthening dollar presses values of dollar-denominated exports, such as many commodities, by reducing their competitiveness to buyers in other currencies. The US share of world corn exports in 2013-14, at less than one-third, will be the lowest since at least the 1960s, bar the drought-affected 2012-13 result, according to the US Department of Agriculture. ‘Excessive air in asset price bubbles’ Professor Goss’s warning follows an observation from officials at the US Federal Reserve’s Chicago bank that “signs of moderation in farmland value gains emerged” in the first three months of 2013. The Kansas City Fed said that “the pace of appreciation moderated somewhat” , noting “slower growth in farm income”, which was limited by “declining crop prices and higher production costs”. Meanwhile, Capital Economics economist Paul Ashworth has warned that “there does appear to be a localised bubble in Corn Belt farmland values”, spurred by last year’s rally in grain prices. Professor Goss also cautioned that 43% of bankers contacted for the Creighton survey concurred the Fed’s ultra-easy monetary policy, which it this week signalled may be withdrawn, had put “excessive air in asset price bubbles such as farmland prices”. However, the survey gave no reading of the breakdown of the other 57% of respondents, and many observers have forecast that interest rates will remain low enough to avoid a repeat of the early-1980s’ crash in land prices. And the latest survey showed farmland price growth accelerating in some states, including Missouri and Nebraska. Professor Goss warned last year over the threat posed by a farmland price “bubble”, before the recovery in crop prices which, with insurance payouts to drought-hit growers, helped lift farm incomes. Continue reading