Tag Archives: south-africa
EM Storms Could Spread To Europe
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/03acf9f0-098b-11e3-8b32-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2cXAczb6b By Ralph Atkins in London Periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for sell-off At the start of this year, emerging market turmoil was on few investors’ worry lists. Top preoccupations were US fiscal woes, the rumbling eurozone debt crisis and a possible “hard” landing for China’s economy. Nobody really considered what would happen if all those threats did not materialise. The financial storms hitting India and other developing economies this week are the answer. With the US economy having successfully avoided possible global upsets and growing steadily, the US Federal Reserve wants to wind down its asset purchases, or “quantitative easing”, from as early as next month. As a result bond prices have fallen, and yields risen correspondingly, in developed markets – and the strong flows of capital into emerging markets that had been attracted by higher yields there have gone firmly into reverse. Worst hit have been countries most reliant on capital inflows – those with gaping current account deficits to finance. In India, where the deficit exceeded 5 per cent of gross domestic product last year, the rupee has tumbled to a record low against the dollar. Equity prices have fallen precipitously, while 10-year bond yields have approached 10 per cent, the highest for five years. The good news is that this has not yet spun into a full-blown emerging market crisis, and the Fed can control the pace at which it “tapers” asset purchases. European shares are benefiting as an alternative contrarian trade for investors looking for underrated assets. The bad news is that we are still at the start of the process of exiting global QE and the effects will spread – including, perhaps, to weaker European economies. Much of what is happening in emerging markets is the result of national factors – India’s troubles have been exacerbated by seemingly cack-handed political decisions. It is also true that global investors fell out of love with emerging market equities long before Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman, first hinted at tapering on May 22. Thus the extent to which tapering is causing the emerging market tensions is disputed. But it seems obvious that tapering talk has at least exacerbated the sell-off. Outflows from Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) bond funds have been equivalent to almost a third of assets under management since May 22, according to EPFR, a funds data provider. That compares with just 4 per cent from the start of the year until Mr Bernanke spoke. Moreover, there has been a clear relationship between the size of current account deficits and the extent to which countries have been hit by the financial turmoil – strengthening the argument that it is reversed QE flows that are the main culprit. Indonesia, where the current account also deteriorated sharply last year, has seen some of the sharpest equity price falls. South Africa, Turkey and Brazil have, like India, seen steep rises in bond yields and tumbling dollar exchange rates. Ominously, the lesson of economic history is that when capital inflows go into reverse, the turnround is often abrupt and painful. Nor are surplus countries immune. When emerging market fund managers have to finance sudden large outflows they are forced to sell higher-quality, more liquid assets – and the effects spread. For Europeans, this week’s events are eerily reminiscent of the damage wreaked on the Baltic states that were running massive current account deficits when the global financial crisis erupted in 2007. Eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. For a while, weaker members of the eurozone were protected by the currency union. But then the eurozone itself was almost torn apart as strong capital flows from the continent’s north to the southern periphery went into reverse. Fixed exchange rate regimes sometimes lull investors into a false sense of security by delaying an inevitable correction. This week’s emerging market turmoil will encourage the shift in investor sentiment back towards developed economies, especially those returning to internally driven, self-sustaining growth. The risk for Europe, however, is that periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for a sell-off. If German 10-year Bund yields are rising – they have this week exceeded 1.9 per cent, compared with less than 1.2 per cent in early May – yields below 4.5 per cent on Italian and Spanish equivalents look less compelling. For now, eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. But we are at the start of a long process in which US monetary policy will evolve – with effects nobody can predict with confidence. Continue reading
Kenya’s real estate boom, boost manufacturing sector
www.abndigital.com Kenya’s booming real estate sector has catalysed growth of manufacturing industry. Tile & Carpet is one firm which has evolved from a text… Continue reading
Shifting Global Investments To Clean Energy
By James A. Harmon July 29, 2013 Cattle graze near wind turbines in Paracuru, Brazil, April 24, 2009. REUTERS/Stuart Grudgings When President Barack Obama announced the country’s first national climate strategy, many people wondered what it would mean across the nation. Yet, the strategy may carry even more significant implications overseas. The plan restricts U.S. government funding for most international coal projects. This policy could significantly affect energy producers and public and private investors around the globe. Why is this important? Global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, a major driver of climate change, hit a record high in 2012. Meanwhile, there are more than 1.2 billion people worldwide still without access to electricity. The global middle class is booming — especially in the developing world — and with it, energy demand is surging. In fact, global energy demand is expected to grow by one-third by 2035. This surge in demand, however, does not need to lead to a surge in carbon pollution. It is well past time for the world to embrace the shift to renewable energy — a shift that would bring economic opportunities while leaving a better planet for future generations. In fact, this transition is already underway. Renewable energy (including hydro) is the fastest-growing power generation sector in the world, according to a recent International Energy Agency report. Renewable energy is on pace to comprise one-quarter of the electricity mix by 2018. It is also increasingly cost-competitive with fossil fuels. Many developing nations, like South Africa, China and Brazil, are setting the pace. Renewable energy investments in developing countries hit $112 billion in 2012, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, close to the $132 billion from developed countries. Obama’s announcement should have a significant ripple effect, especially on major U.S. lending institutions. The U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), which works with the private sector to invest abroad in support of development activities, committed around $1 billion to renewable energy projects in each of the past two years, with its annual commitments increasing nearly 10-fold since 2009. Its recent renewable energy investments are focused on Peru, South Africa and Pakistan, among others. The U.S. Export-Import Bank, where I was chairman from 1997 to 2001, has similarly increased its share of renewable energy financing. The Export-Import Bank provided $355 million for renewable energy investments in 2012 — more than triple the amount in 2009. Exports to wind farms in Honduras are now powering job growth in states like Pennsylvania and Oklahoma. Obama’s announcement will help the bank balance its portfolio away from fossil fuel projects and toward the renewable energy projects that will help create U.S. jobs by selling clean energy technologies abroad. Momentum is clearly growing as the World Bank just announced that it will restrict funding of new coal-fired power plants to rare circumstances and support universal access to reliable modern energy. Even before its decision, the bank was taking steps in this direction — $3.6 billion of its $8.2 billion in energy investments between June 2011 and June 2012 went to renewable energy projects. The bank has some important test cases, including in Kosovo, in the near future. Also last week, the European Investment Bank said it would stop financing most coal-fired power plants to reduce pollution and meet climate targets. Clearly, renewable energy can be profitable for business. Many companies, like Wal-Mart, Google and General Electric, have made major bets on renewables. Notably Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway firm has been increasing its clean energy investments, with a recent purchase of $5.6 billion for a renewable energy company in Nevada and a $2.4 billion investment in a wind farm in California. As clean energy markets expand, these American companies and investors will be well-positioned to lead. The reality is that emerging economies do not need to go down a path of relying on fossil fuels. Just as many developing countries skipped land lines and went straight to cellular telephones, these countries can leapfrog right to affordable clean energy. Investing in clean energy is not only good for the economic growth, it is good for people. The unfortunate reality is that those in the poorest countries are often the most vulnerable to climate change — whether from rising seas that threaten homes and water supplies or droughts that drive up food prices. This is the human cost of fossil fuels that often goes unmentioned in balance sheets and gross domestic product statistics. Considering the risks of climate change and benefits of clean energy, the president’s climate plan clearly deserves our support. Now, it is our collective responsibility to turn this plan into a reality. Continue reading