Tag Archives: romania
Are MEPs Ready To Deliver Carbon Backloading Compromise?
Eight MEPs from ALDE group in European Parliament also call for urgent structural reform to the Emissions Trading System By Jessica Shankleman 17 Jun 2013 MEPs in the European Parliament will this week decide whether to water down the plan to delay the auctioning of 900 million carbon allowances, in pursuit of a compromise that could green light the controversial attempt to force up the price of carbon. Hopes are mounting that a new package of rules governing how the backloading programme is enacted could help secure sufficient support in the European Parliament for a vote on the plan to pass at the second time of asking. However, a group of liberal MEPs have warned the Commission that time is running out to find a permanent fix for the the bloc’s faltering emissions trading scheme (ETS), which has seen prices crash to an all time low because of a huge surplus of carbon allowances. Nearly 70 MEPs in the Parliament’s Environment Committee will on Wednesday vote to decide exactly what backloading proposals should be put to the plenary next month. The largest parties, the European People’s Party (EPP), Socialists and Democrats and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats (ALDE) have reportedly already agreed a compromise proposal that would include assurances that the witholding of allowances would not be repeated, and that backloading would not lead to the permanent withdrawal of delayed carbon allowances. They will also vote on whether to propose a fund that would take money made from the auctioning of allowances to help energy intensive sectors invest in low carbon technology. The compromises are designed to secure fresh support for the backloading proposals, after a previous bid to push through the plan in April narrowly failed when it was defeated in by 334-315 votes, forcing the plan to return to the committee stage. Chris Davies, British Liberal Democrat MEP and ALDE leader in the Environment Committee, said he was optimistic the backloading would be approved at the second time of asking. “People were very fearful last time round that there would be a huge increase in the carbon price,” he told BusinessGreen . “Even BusinessEurope which opposed backloading last time accept now that any price increase will be unlikely to make a huge difference to competiveness of European industry.” He said the proposed fund for energy intensive industries could be established before 2020 to ensure that low carbon investments can be made swiftly, despite the risk that spending the money before the end of the 2013-2020 Phase III of the ETS could undermine the short-term purpose of backloading by further reducing demand for carbon allowances. But Davies acknowleged that a successful vote this time around could also depend on the Green Party agreeing to the compromises. The Greens have said they could vote against the new proposals, on the grounds that the concessions would stop backloading pushing up the carbon price in any meaningful way. Green MEP Bas Eikhout said the group was unlikely to back the compromise at the preliminary vote by the Environment Committee. “I thought fixing ets was the goal. Now it seems fixing backloading is getting the goal. Less ambition by the day,” he wrote on Twitter last week. But beyond the quick fix that backloading may or may not provide to the carbon price, ALDE MEPs are becoming increasingly concerned that time is running out to deliver more meaningful reforms to the ETS. ALDE MEPs from a range of committees last week wrote to Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, warning that a failure to reform the EU ETS with both long and short term measures would push up the price of tackling climate change for member states. The letter, seen by BusinessGreen , and signed by eight MEPs, including Davies and Fiona Hall, warned that EU’s carbon market cannot be allowed to fail at a time when other countries and regions are looking to set up their own carbon trading schemes. “If the ETS were allowed to fail, EU Member States would still have to deliver on their climate change commitments and would thus be forced to put new mechanisms in place,” adds the letter, which is also signed by Denmark’s Jens Rohde, Germany’s Jurgen Creutzmann, Sweden’s Kent Johansson , France’s Corinne Lepage, Bulgaria’s Vladko Todorov Panayotov, and Romania’s Adina Ioana Valean. “That is why, in parallel with the rapid resolution of the backloading proposal, it is essential to move forward now with structural reform of the ETS and to restore the system’s credibility.” The Commission is due to present structural reform proposals for the ETS this Autumn, which centre on permanently retiring two billion carbon allowances or lowering the emissions cap for companies covered by the ETS in order to increase demand in the market. But the MEPs are concerned that a changeover in the Commission in 2014 will delay progress on the new structural reforms being decided on and implemented until 2015. Davies told BusinessGreen that the letter was designed to push the Commission to start debating long term reforms, despite the run up to next year’s European elections. “In the parliament there seems to be general support for the idea of structural reforms,” he said. But my concern is that when the proposals are put forward, people will find lots of opportunities to disagree with them. We could end up being in the position of a new commission coming in October next year, and it could be 2015 before anything is brought forward and we think that delay [to the wider structural reforms] would be inappropriate.” But alongside these fears, the letter to Hedegaard also suggests that the ALDE group may be closer to building a consensus on the backloading proposals. Panayotov, Valean and Creutzmann all voted against backloading in April, but their signatures on the letter suggest they may now be prepared to support a compromise agreement. Davies, who supported the first backloading vote, said he hoped there would be greater support from ALDE this time round, even though there would still be a split. “It’s not the Environment Committee members we need to win over, it’s the rest of the parliament that voted against backloading last time,” he added. Environment Commitee MEPs will also this week vote on proposals to tighten the EU’s regulation on flourinated gases such as those used in fridges, which have a powerful greenhouse gas effect, and plans to boost the economy through green sustainable industries and ecodesign requirements for water heaters and hot water storage tanks. But despite all these votes all eyes will be on the latest twist in the long-running backloading saga, as both opponents and supporters of the plan wait to see if MEPs can revive the carbon market after all. Continue reading
Trends In The Renewable Energy Landscape
June 6, 2013 By Gil Forer Gil Forer Global Leader, Global Cleantech Center, Ernst & Young A new era is dawning in the renewable energy industry. Energy demand, natural resource, technology costs, access to finance and global competitiveness are identified as the key influences for investors. According to the tenth anniversary edition of the Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI), which was recently released by Ernst & Young, global annual clean energy investment totaled US$269b in 2012, representing a five-fold increase on 2004. The sector now competes for investment with more traditional energy sources, and new technologies — such as solar panels, biomass boilers and mini wind turbines — are enabling energy users to run their own small power plants, changing the way businesses and consumers think about energy. The renewable energy landscape today is truly global. From Japan and Southeast Asia to Africa and South America, renewable energy is a viable energy source that is gaining a solid and growing share in the energy mix. But, the renewables industry is facing growing pains. Not only is the future a place with less government support, but industry players also have to fight for market share across all corners of the globe and with some worrying signs of trade barriers emerging. For an industry that is still relatively new, this is a seriously challenging time; leaders need to be conversant in international business, conscious of global politics, and clever in innovating new business models and business relationships to win in an increasingly global competitive world. South America and Asia Pac continue to rise as Europe and the Middle East stall Our index sees the US regain the top spot, as high barriers to entry for external investors realign China into second place. However, growth prospects for the sector in China remain strong with continued GDP growth, increasing energy demand, and the ongoing strategic importance of the sector to the local economy providing solid foundations for the future. South America continues to grow in prominence, thanks in part to its growing energy demand. Chile’s project pipeline includes 300MW-400MW concentrated solar power (CSP) plants, while Peru has entered the index for the first time due to good resources and a strong investment climate. However, new policy measures and tender cancelations in Brazil are likely to temper the rapid growth seen in the region over the last 18 months. High levels of project activity and investment interest in Japan and Australia give the Asia Pacific region a stronger presence at the top of the index. Thailand also joins the index in this issue, boasting strong solar resource and a healthy project pipeline, as well as stable fiscal and regulatory support measures. In Europe, Romania became the latest to slash its subsidies, reinforcing the relatively somber mood in Eastern Europe as policy makers try to find the balance between growth and sustainability. A number of the Middle East and North Africa countries, including Egypt, Tunisia and the UAE, have fallen out of the top 40 due to a slow recovery from the Arab Spring and an absence of clear policy frameworks delaying capacity deployment. Transaction market – the continuing squeeze Recent deal activity in the sector has been characterized by incumbents and new entrants driving industry consolidation. There is also a strong appetite from Far East construction groups and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) seeking development pipelines of solar and wind assets to provide a distribution channel for their products. Factors driving the levels of investment in renewable energy include divestment needs, market restructuring and the entry of new investors into the sector. Utilities and financial buyers are finding greater value in buying operational plants than investing in plant construction. The mismatch between project sponsors’ capital expenditure plans and the corporate capacity to finance this investment will continue to drive more asset disposals. Both financial investors and OEMs under pressure from overcapacity are likely to remain the most active buyers of operational assets and development assets respectively. Further consolidation can be expected in the supply chain. New markets are gaining momentum. Countries and corporations are increasing their focus on changing their energy mix to ensure it provides financial, reputational, operational and social benefits. We’re also seeing the development and implementation of national renewable energy program best practices. In summary, with the shift in the democratization of the energy sector and the increasing power of the customer, the future of renewable energy in the energy mix is bright. For more information about the report, including a discussion of our evolved methodology, please visit www.ey.com/recai . Gil Forer is global leader of the Global Cleantech Center for Ernst & Young. Continue reading
Agriculture Is On The Lips Of Everyone These Days In Romania
Simona Bazavan, Business Review – 28.05.2013 Average farmland prices have almost tripled in Romania since 2007 and the upward trend is showing no sign of slowing, especially in light of next year’s market liberalization. Buying Romanian farmland continues to be an attractive business opportunity for both locals and foreigners despite recent price hikes, but issues such as land fragmentation are slowing down investors. Agriculture is on the lips of everyone these days in Romania, be it businesspeople, entrepreneurs, investors, analysts, politicians, and of course, the farmers themselves. In the context of a struggling economy, farming is constantly mentioned as a source of growth, and with soaring food prices worldwide, farmland acquisition is proving to be a very lucrative business option. Fueled by increasing demand, prices have taken off in Romania. While back in 2007 the average price of a hectare of farmland was EUR 927, it had skyrocketed to EUR 1,972 by 2011 and this year has gone well beyond EUR 2,000 per hectare. Prices will remain on an upward trend and are forecast to reach an average of EUR 3,000 per hectare by 2015, according to a 2012 DTZ Echinox report. “The economic crisis has not significantly affected transactions in this sector and although prices have kept increasing – compared with 2008, prices per hectare have doubled – Romania continues to be attractive to investors, mainly because of prices, which are seven or even eight times lower than the rest of Europe,” Flavius Pop, consultant with the investments department of DTZ Echinox, told BR. Low prices combined with the high quality of the soil and large surfaces of available land have so far persuaded numerous local investors as well as many foreign companies and investment funds to buy farmland. Yet there are discrepancies between demand and offer and this has got worse lately. “Many investors have found that farmland properties which cover thousands of hectares in established regions such as southern and western Romania are increasingly scarce,” Pop added. Romania boasts a large stock of farmland but, ironically enough, this selling point also provides the main stumbling block for the farmland market. The 2010-2011 national agriculture census revealed that there are about 8.2 million hectares of arable land in Romania, placing it in fifth position in the EU, after France, Spain, Poland and Germany. However, about 25 percent of this is estimated to be divided into plots of under one hectare, making it difficult for buyers to consolidate larger plots. Most of them are looking to buy compact plots larger than 1,000 hectares, yet this might require as many as 900 individual transactions. The lack of cadastral documentation, the high costs of obtaining it and bureaucracy are the main challenges potential buyers have to deal with. And close to nothing has been done over the past few years by the authorities to address this issue. “Buyers are interested in large surfaces located in a single region with as high a consolidation level as possible, with access to the water supply and irrigation infrastructure, even if this not functional in the beginning but can be later reconditioned (…),” stressed Pop. All the procedures required to close a transaction involving large plots of farmland are hiking prices and often “complicate the process of negotiating and closing the deal because of the numerous interests involved,” Ana-Maria Goga, partner and coordinator of the real estate department of Pachiu & Associates, told BR. Essentially, land fragmentation, lack of cadastral documentation and legal uncertainty about the status of a large share of the existing farmland leads to delays, if not blockages, and additional costs incurred through intermediaries and legal clarifications, which in most cases have to be paid by the buyer, she explained. But even despite such setbacks, prices continue to rise and “today we can speak of growth rates of between 10 and 12 percent,” according to Pop. However, prices can vary greatly depending on the region. In the north-east and south-east of Romania, average sale prices are between EUR 2,000 and EUR 2,150 per hectare, while in areas near the capital, average prices reach EUR 2,700 per hectare, show DTZ Echinox data. There are even bigger differences between farmland prices in Romania and the situation in the rest of Europe. In England a hectare can be traded at EUR 24,000, while in Denmark prices reach EUR 33,000 per hectare. Going east, a hectare costs as little as EUR 700 in Ukraine. The upward trend will be maintained over the coming years, “and prices will most likely stabilize the moment Romanian agriculture reaches a degree of maturity characterized by the productive exploitation of a significant number of compact plots with a clarified legal and cadastral status by entities able to provide the necessary infrastructure to cultivate the land in a continuous and sustained manner,” said Goga. This would also help limit speculation and the intervention of intermediaries in farmland transactions. Fears of market liberalization From January 1, 2014, non-resident foreign citizens are set to be able to buy Romanian farmland, under Romania’s Treaty of Accession to the EU, and the chances of stopping this from happening are very slim. The topic has often been debated over the past couple of years and continues to be so, with politicians and especially local farmers arguing that Romania must find ways to restrict the purchase of local farmland by non-resident foreign citizens beyond the 2014 deadline. Their argument is that land prices continue to be much cheaper in Romania than throughout the rest of the EU and local farmers will be facing unfair competition from international players who have far greater financial power. Come 2014, there will be massive farmland acquisitions made by foreigners, farmers complain. Most recently, President Traian Basescu suggested that farmland acquisitions by foreigners risk endangering Romania’s agricultural production and advised owners not to sell their plots. “If we like to believe that we don’t sell our country, then I would like to see Romanians not selling their land. This is the first condition to prevent the land from being sold,” he said during the annual meeting of the Romanian Agricultural Producers’ League (LAPAR), two weeks ago. Basescu stressed that the matter depends both on farmers and the government, which he said should set up an agency with the right of first buyer when owners want to sell. Others argue that most of the damage has already been done. Under Law 312/2005 foreign citizens and companies registered outside Romania will not obtain the right to own land in Romania until seven years after Romania’s EU accession, which is 2014. However, foreign investors can, and many have, circumvented this legislative restriction by purchasing land through locally registered companies. Of the country’s 14 million hectares of farmland, nearly 1 million hectares has been purchased by companies with foreign ownership over recent years. This means an estimated 7 percent of the country’s total farmland, which makes Romania the European country with the largest share of national farmland owned by foreigners. Given that many foreigners have already bought local farmland via locally established companies, it is unlikely that lifting the ban in 2014 will cause demand to explode, argued Pop. Goga, too, stresses that no significant change can be expected following market liberalization. Nevertheless, “at present there are several foreign companies from Europe as well as the Middle East which are testing the local market. Some of these companies have been active locally for a long time and they are familiar with local working procedures and will continue to invest in order to expand their portfolio,” said the real estate consultant. Prolonging the period during which Romania can restrict farmland acquisition by foreigners after 2014 could only have been achieved if the accession treaty had been changed, an almost impossible endeavor. Instead, the authorities said they would find solutions to limit transactions made by foreigners such as such as allowing land purchases only up to a specified maximum amount or allowing acquisition only for individuals who can prove they have a background in agriculture. Agriculture minister Daniel Constantin said last week that Romania must reach a balance between limiting farmland acquisitions by foreigners and encouraging foreign investments in local agriculture. A solution he mentioned could be to stimulate local owners, especially those who own small surfaces, to lease their land rather than sell it. This could be done by increasing the EU subsidy they receive by 20 percent to those who choose to lease for the long run. The measure is included in the proposed reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (2014-2020). Yet, despite any such initiatives, Romanian farmland is set to cultivate future growth over the coming years – be the buyers locals or foreigners – based on both global trends and local availability, making it a valuable and sought after asset and a safe alternative investment option. Source: Businessreview.ro Continue reading