Tag Archives: president
Renewables Industry Calls For 2030 EU Renewable Target
19th September 2013 Representatives of over 60 British and European renewable energy companies and associations, have written to the European Parliament President Martin Schulz, EU Energy Ministers and the EU Energy and Climate Commissioners to call for a legally binding 2030 target for renewable energy as part of what they describe as a “a strong and ambitious regulatory framework for the years to come. The letter, organised by the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC) and signed by the UK’s Renewable Energy Association and more than 60 others, notes the success of the existing 20-20-20 framework in setting “a clear direction” for industry, together with what it claims is the urgent need for a 2030 framework “given the long investment cycles in the energy sector”. The letter claims that “Such a framework bears the opportunity to reduce the current costs of uncertainty, mobilise the needed funding, help to protect the environment, decrease the costs of decarbonisation, facilitate the creation of new jobs and enhance the EU’s technology leadership.” The 20-20-20 framework requires a 20% increase in energy efficiency, 20% reduction of CO2 emissions, and 20% renewables by 2020. It is claimed it has been the fundamental driver of national level policies to expand the renewables industry, especially the 2020 renewable energy targets which are devolved to member states. The REA claims that jobs in the UK renewables’ sector could grow from 110,000 in 2012 to 400,000 in 2020 as the industry expands to reach the 2020 UK’s targets of 15% renewable energy and 10% renewable transport. EREC also manages the ‘Keep on Track!’ project, which monitors member states’ progress towards their targets and seeks to identify and overcome barriers to expansion. The REA is the official UK partner for the project, which published its first EU Tracking Roadmap in June, alongside a report on barriers to expansion and a set of policy recommendations. The UK was the only country in the project to miss its interim 2011/12 renewables target – albeit by a narrow margin. REA Chief Executive Dr Nina Skorupska says, “The UK remains in the bottom three of the EU renewables league table with only 4% renewables while Sweden tops the table with almost 50%. The UK has only scratched the surface so far in terms of the opportunities for growth, innovation, jobs and exports that renewables can bring to UK plc. “But Government has learned a lot from working within this 20-20-20 framework, and it makes sense to go for a similar framework for 2030, including a binding renewables target. This will enable Government to build on those lessons, reassure investors, scale up the industry, boost our energy security, reduce our emissions and grow our budding green economy.” Continue reading
Assad govt hails ‘victory’ in arms deal, troops attack
Assad govt hails ‘victory’ in arms deal, troops attack (Reuters) / 16 September 2013 Syria’s government hailed as a “victory” a Russian-brokered deal that has averted US strikes, while President Barack Obama defended a chemical weapons pact that the rebels fear has bolstered their enemy in the civil war. President Bashar Al Assad’s jets and artillery hit rebel suburbs of the capital again on Sunday in an offensive that residents said began last week when Obama delayed air strikes in the face of opposition from Moscow and his own electorate. France’s President Francois Hollande (R) takes part in a televised interview with French journalist Claire Chazal on French TF1 television channel’s prime-time evening news broadcast in Paris on September 15. -Reuters Speaking of the US-Russian deal, Syrian minister Ali Haidar told Moscow’s RIA news agency: “These agreements … are a victory for Syria, achieved thanks to our Russian friends.” Though not close to Assad, Ali was the first Syrian official to react to Saturday’s accord in Geneva by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Bridging an angry East-West rift over Syria, they agreed to back a nine-month UN programme to destroy Assad’s chemical arsenal. The deal has put off the threat of air strikes Obama made after poison gas killed hundreds of Syrians on August 21, although he has stressed that force remains an option if Assad reneges. US forces remain in position. Russia still opposes military action but now backs possible UN sanctions for non-compliance. French President Francois Hollande called for a UN resolution on Syria backed by the threat of punitive action to be voted by the end of this week. Hollande also said the option of military strikes must remain on the table. Kerry, visiting Israel, responded to widespread doubts about the feasibility of the “the most far-reaching chemical weapons removal ever” by insisting the plan could work. And he and Obama sought to reassure Israelis the decision to hold fire on Syria does not mean Iran can pursue nuclear weapons with impunity. Obama embraced the Syria disarmament proposal floated last week by Russian President Vladimir Putin after his plan for US military action hit resistance in Congress. Lawmakers feared an open-ended new entanglement in the Middle East and were troubled by the presence of Al Qaeda followers among Assad’s opponents. Obama dismissed critics of his quick-changing tactics on Syria for focusing on “style” not substance. And while thanking Putin for pressing his “client the Assad regime” to disarm, he chided Russia for questioning Assad’s guilt over the gas attack. Responding to concerns, notably in Israel, that a display of American weakness toward Assad could encourage his Iranian backers to develop nuclear weapons, Obama said Tehran’s nuclear programme was a “far larger issue” for him than Assad’s toxins. “They shouldn’t draw a lesson, that we haven’t struck, to think we won’t strike Iran,” he told ABC television, disclosing he had exchanged letters with Iran’s new president. “On the other hand, what they should draw from this lesson is that there is the potential of resolving these issues diplomatically.” Obama had no lack of critics, however, at home and abroad. REBELS DISMISS TALKS Syrian National Reconciliation Minister Ali said Syria welcomed the deal: “They have prevented a war against Syria by denying a pretext to those who wanted to unleash it.” He also echoed Kerry and Lavrov in saying it might help Syrians “sit round one table to settle their internal problems”. But rebels, calling the international focus on poison gas a sideshow, have dismissed talk the arms pact might herald peace talks and said Assad has stepped up an offensive with ordinary weaponry now that the threat of US air strikes has receded. A spokesman for the opposition Syrian National Coalition repeated that it wanted world powers to prevent Assad from using his air force, tanks and artillery on civilian areas. “Assad is effectively being rewarded for the use of chemical weapons,” Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Doha Centre wrote in the Atlantic magazine. “Now, he can get away with nearly anything – as long as he sticks to using good old conventional weapons.” International responses to the accord were also guarded. Western governments, wary of Assad and familiar with the years frustrated UN weapons inspectors spent in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, noted the huge technical difficulties in destroying one of the world’s biggest chemical arsenals in the midst of civil war. Iran hailed a US retreat from “extremist behaviour” and welcomed its “rationality”. Israel said the deal would be judged on results. China, which like Russia opposes US readiness to use force against sovereign states, was glad of the renewed role for the UN Security Council, where Beijing too has a veto. The Syrian government has formally told the United Nations it will adhere to a treaty banning chemical weapons. The US-Russian framework agreement calls for the United Nations to enforce the removal of existing stockpiles by the middle of next year. BOMBARDMENTS Air strikes, shelling and ground attacks on Damascus suburbs on Sunday backed up statements from Assad’s supporters and opponents that he is back on the offensive after a lull in which his troops took up defensive positions, expecting US strikes. “It’s a clever proposal from Russia to prevent the attacks,” said an Assad supporter from the port city of Tartous. An opposition activist in Damascus echoed disappointment among rebel leaders: “Helping Syrians would mean stopping the bloodshed,” he said. Poison gas is estimated to have killed only hundreds of the more than 100,000 dead in a war that has also forced a third of the population to flee their homes since 2011. Russia says it is not specifically supporting Assad – though it has provided much of his weaponry. Its concern, it says, is to prevent Assad’s Western and Arab enemies from imposing their will on a sovereign state. And Moscow, like Assad, highlights the role of al Qaeda-linked Islamists among the rebel forces. Their presence, and divisions among Assad’s opponents in a war that has inflamed sectarian passions across the region, have tempered Western support. Al Qaeda leader Ayman Al Zawahri urged followers on Sunday not to cooperate with other Syrian rebels. The opposition Syrian National Coalition elected a moderate Islamist on Saturday as prime minister of an exile government – a move some members said was opposed by Western powers who want to see an international peace conference bring the warring sides together to produce a compromise transitional administration. Previous attempts to revive peace efforts begun last year at Geneva have foundered on the bitter hostilities among Syrians. Continue reading
