Tag Archives: korea
Report: South Korea To Launch World’s Most Ambitious Carbon Trading Scheme
Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicts price of carbon in South Korean scheme could hit $90 a tonne By BusinessGreen staff 14 May 2013 South Korea is preparing to introduce the world’s most ambitious emissions trading scheme, potentially paving the way for carbon costs as high as $90 a tonne for many of the country’s key industries. That is the stark conclusion of a major new report from Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) and Ernst & Young, which hails the proposed scheme as the world’s most ambitious carbon-pricing policy but warns that changes to the proposals may be required before the scheme is introduced in 2015 to avoid “punitive” costs on industry. “If the government implements the scheme without any changes, it will have major implications for Korean companies,” said Richard Chatterton, lead analyst for carbon markets at BNEF, in a statement. “A carbon price will lead to higher power prices and impose additional costs on industrial firms. The government is mitigating the impact for covered entities by handing out most allowances for free, but costs could still rise quickly.” The report calculates that if South Korea adheres to its national target of cutting emissions to 30 per cent below business-as-usual levels by 2020 emissions reductions delivered through the planned emissions trading scheme would have to reach 836 million tonnes between 2015 and 2020. But it also predicts the “need to reduce emissions will, however, exceed the options available within industrial companies and from the country’s current fleet of gas fired power stations”, meaning that the target is likely to be missed and the price of carbon in the scheme will effectively be set by a $90 a tonne penalty price for company’s exceeding their emissions cap . The government hopes that businesses will be able to comply with the cap by accelerating the shift toward lower carbon energy sources, such as gas, renewables, and carbon capture and storage plants. But the BNEF report warns that the cost of such technologies is likely to be significantly higher than the penalty price, meaning many firms are likely to opt to exceed their targets. It recommends that the government consider a number of options to improve the proposed scheme, including relaxing the number of offset credits companies can use to count towards their carbon target or loosening the over-arching cap on emissions. “The challenge is to put in place a carbon price high enough to impact investment decisions, but low enough to transition smoothly towards a carbon-constrained economy,” said Milo Sjardin, head of Asia research for BNEF, in a statement. “With the proposed design, demand and supply within the ETS are not well-matched and will lead to unnecessarily high carbon prices. Policy-makers will need to look at cost containment measures closely while not compromising the ambitions of the scheme.” However, Yoon Joo-Hoon, senior manager at Ernst & Young, warned that while changes to the proposals could be made businesses still needed to be preparing now to the likely impact of the scheme, arguing that firms should be looking at carbon mitigation options and developing a plan for operating effectively under an emissions trading scheme. Continue reading
Farmland — Gold You Can Eat
by Chris Bennett in Farm Press Blog Will investors continue to park their money on farmland? Speculation on a farmland crash hasn’t put a dent in the market. Talk of bubbles or crashes hasn’t put a dent in the farmland market, and if the end is nigh — nobody is blinking. Farmland is “gold I can eat” to Steve Romick, a heavyweight investor and managing partner at FPA Funds. Farmland purchases have moved far beyond the agriculture industry, with insurance agencies, specialized investors, foreign firms and pension funds all throwing elbows in a bidding war. Romick, in an interview with Forbes , answered the “Why farmland now?” question by comparing it with the gold market: “I don’t know how to value gold. I don’t know if it should be a thousand dollars an ounce, the rough cost to pull it out of the ground, or $1,600 an ounce, where it is today, or whether it should be $2,000 or God forbid it’s $4,000 because government may take it away from you … “I look at farmland. Farmland has increased in price. But farmland, interestingly, will benefit from the same things that gold will benefit from. If there’s inflation, farmland will benefit. If there’s a decline in fiat currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, farmland will benefit. Ag prices are denominated in dollars. So if the dollar drops by 50 percent versus the won, for example, in Korea they can buy twice as much or their economy can benefit by not having to spend as much for the same amount of food.” Traditional investments often have been anemic and the poor returns have helped carve a channel for new dollars to flow toward cropland; dollars that would typically have gone elsewhere. The rise in farmland prices and the pace of sales is brisk, with the Midwest leading the spike. Iowa, South Dakota and Nebraska have doubled their 2005 farmland values. Iowa acreage averages $8,296 per acre, reflecting the confidence in corn and commodity demand, and an Iowa farm recently went for $21,900 per acre. In 2012, a Swiss bank bought 9,800 acres of Wisconsin cropland for $67.5 million. UBS AgriVest Farmland Fund Inc., a Connecticut-based farm real estate fund, is expected to close on a $108-million bid for 29,000 farmland acres in Wisconsin and Texas, according to Farmland Investor Letter . The value of the purchases is dizzying and the number of investor players beyond ag is growing. Midwest farm values get the most attention, but coast-to-coast, the same cropland value pattern is evident. California is a prime example, where farmland values grew to $7,200 in 2012. Almond acreage in Tulare County can bring close to $20,000 per acre. Continue reading
Franklin Templeton Launches Asian Dividend Fund For Mobius
03 May 2013 | 11:51 Dan Jones Franklin Templeton has launched an Asian Dividend fund for head of emerging markets Mark Mobius as it seeks to tap into investors’ growing desire to diversify income streams. The Templeton Asian Dividend fund, run by Mobius ( pictured ) and Tom Wu, will focus on companies offering attractive dividend yields, or those that have the potential to produce such yields over time. Investing in countries across Asia, it seeks to generate a higher income yield than its benchmark, the MSCI All Country Asia-Pacific ex Japan Total Return index. The investment universe includes countries such as Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. Mobius, who runs a wide range of funds at the group including Templeton Emerging Markets and Templeton Frontier Markets, will work with Wu to select stocks for the portfolio, but both will be supported by a large team of analysts. Launched as a Luxembourg SICAV, the fund will be registered in the UK, subject to FCA approval. “Dividend yields are an important source of income, as investors are finding it increasingly difficult to source meaningful yield in fixed income without higher specific risk,” said Mobius. He added the rising number of payouts in Asia make it an attractive area for income-hungry investors. Asian equity income funds have seen a surge in popularity among UK retail investors in recent years, with the likes of Newton, Invesco Perpetual and Liontrust all unveiling offerings in the space. Newton Asian Income, run by Jason Pidcock, has seen assets surge from £1.2bn at the end of 2011 to a current level of £3.9bn as investor demand for yield continues apace. more: http://www.investmen…s#ixzz2SJQecoz6 Investment Week – News and analysis for investment advisors and wealth managers. Claim your free subscription today. Continue reading