Tag Archives: javascript
Preparing For Thursday’s USDA Reports
Stu Ellis, FarmGate Blog September 9, 2013 USDA’s September series of crop reports will be released at 11 am central on Thursday, Sept. 12. These include the Crop Production Report and the World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) Report. Both are highly anticipated by the market and are expected to further clarify the size of the corn and soybean crop. The trade will get a much better handle on the size of the soybean crop because many soybean field sampled by USDA crop enumerators in August were not setting pods yet. Nearly all fields will be somewhere between the pod-setting phase and harvest at this time and yield numbers will be better determined. The market has been projecting its pre-report estimates during the past week and those estimates follow. Corn USDA last sampled cornfields at the first of August, and here is what enumerators found: USDA’s August estimate was a 154.4 bu./A yield with a total crop at 13.763 bil. bu. USDA projected harvested acres at 89.1 mil. In August USDA forecast 2012-13 carryout of 719 mil. bu. and 1.837 bil. bu. for the 2013-14 marketing year surplus. Globally, USDA projected surplus of 123.11 mmt for 2012-13 and 150.17 mmt for 2013-14. 1) The average trade estimate for the US corn yield is 153.7 bu./A, with harvested acreage at 88.6 and total corn production of 13.620 bil. bu. The trade estimate for 2012-13 corn carryout is 718 mil. bu. The market expects 2013-2014 domestic ending stocks to be 1.732 bil. bu. The trade is also estimating global corn carryout of 122.8 mmt for the 2012-13 crop; and global carryout for the new crop is expected by traders to be 146.9 mmt. 2) Informa Economics forecasts a corn yield of 157.2 bu./A, down from its estimate of 158.6 bu. in Aug. with total production at 14.013 bil. bu., down from 14.14 bil. in Aug. Although, unsaid, the use of USDA’s August numbers for expected demand for the new crop leaves a carryout over 2.0 bil. 3) FC Stone is projecting a 2013 corn yield of 156.4 bu./A with total crop of 13.942 bil. bu. 4) Lanworth is projecting a 13.320 bil. bu. corn crop, based on 151.6 bu./A Soybeans When USDA last surveyed soybeans the first of August, here is what enumerators found: USDA’s August projection was 42.6 bu./A and a 3.255 bil. bu. total crop. USDA had projected harvested acreage at 76.4 mil. acres. Ending stocks were forecast at 125 mil. bu. for the 2012-13 crop and 220 mil. bu. for the 2013-14 crop. Globally, USDA had projected old crop carryout at 62.2 mmt and new crop carryout at 72.3 mmt. 1) The average estimate from the market is a 41.2 bu./A national yield, with harvested acreage at 76.2 mil. and a total crop of 3.14 bil. bu. The trade is also expecting tight carryout of 123 mil. for the 2012-13 crop and 165 mil. for the 2013-14 crop. The average guess for the market is for a global carryout of 61.7 mmt for the old crop and 71.2 mmt for the new crop. 2) Informa Economics projects a 42.4 bu./A national yield, producing a 3.239 bil. bu. national crop. Informa is also forecasting only 74 mil. acres planted to soybeans. Using USDA’s August projections for demand, Informa’s estimates would result in a 205 mil. bu. new crop carryout. 3) FC Stone is forecasting a 3.146 bil. bu soybean crop, based on yields of 41.2 bu./A. 4) Lanworth projects 2013-14 soybean production of 3.114 bil. bu., based on 40.4 bu./A. Continue reading
China Corn Imports Could Reach 20-30 Million Tonnes
Reuters | September 6, 2013 China could import 20 million to 30 million tonnes of corn a year to cover growing supply shortages, a researcher with a government think tank said on Thursday, as much as four times current levels. This would be around a quarter of globally traded corn and up to twice as much as number one importer Japan buys, a boon to exporters like the United States, Ukraine and Argentina. While Xu Xiaoqing, the head of the rural department at the State Council’s Development and Research Centre, didn’t give a timeframe, his comments to a conference are another sign that China is relaxing its policy of being self sufficient in the feed grain. The think tank, an agency of the country’s cabinet, doesn’t decide policy but does directly advise and issue policy recommendations to Chinese leaders. “For corn, we can maintain basic self-sufficiency and whenever there is a shortfall, we could import – there would be no problem importing 20-30 million tonnes,” said Xu. “But we should keep self-sufficient in staple grains of wheat and rice.” Imports are expected to rise to 7 million tonnes in 2013/14, 3.3 percent of China’s total domestic output of 211 million tonnes. Xu’s comments reflect a wider debate in government about the country’s food security goals in the light of soaring demand, rapid urbanisation, declining farmland and a shortage of agricultural labour. Agriculture minister Han Changfu on Sunday told state media that corn imports would have to rise gradually in order to meet feed demand, reversing his 2012 vow that China would not allow itself to become dependent on foreign supplies. China could tweak its grain security strategy by allowing its corn self-sufficiency rate to fall to around 80 percent, Xu said. China has long vowed to maintain a 95-percent rate of self-sufficiency in major staples, but imports of rice and corn have been steadily rising, and analysts also expect the country to start sourcing large quantities of meat from overseas. Xu said China’s demand for beef has risen more than twice as quickly as domestic production in recent years, driving up prices. He said meat consumption would continue to rise as China urbanises, and imports could be increased. Continue reading
Old McDonald Had A … Good Investment
You’ve heard it a million times: invest in real estate because “they’re not making any more of it.” Often, that’s less than true. Manhattan hasn’t gotten any bigger, but its residential and office capacity has soared. It is more than true, however, for farmland: the number of arable acres per world population has been falling steadily since the 1960s. Many reasons for investing in farmland are screamingly obvious: it produces current yield with no interest rate risk; generates returns highly uncorrelated to the general financial markets; and protects holders from inflation. That’s why some folks like to call it “gold with a coupon.” But, are these reasons maybe too obvious? After all, larger institutions have been pouring money in to farmland for years, and per-acre prices have had a tremendous run over the past decade and more. Is too late for average investors to get in? I don’t think so. The reason is simple: the fundamentals still work. Properly acquired acreage still maps to a solid 4% yield, appreciation completely aside. That’s what you should expect from a cash lease on a quality property producing corn, wheat, and soybeans–irreplaceable elements of the worlds’ diet. (I’ll pass on handicapping almond and avocado farms). And 4% — without interest rate risk and with inflation protection — looks awfully good right now. Could land values fall and damage your total returns? Of course. But there are some awfully strong fundamental reasons that support even these recent higher prices. Most basic is the huge, rising, politically empowered middle class of the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America. One thing you can pretty much count on is that better diets will on the top of their agendas. And that means direct demand for grain staples, and also for animal protein, which depends on… those same staples. Indeed, one credible estimate says that if every person in China suddenly had two eggs a day, it would take the entire Canadian wheat output just to feed those overworked hens. But there’s another, pretty surprising, reason land values are unlikely to fall significantly, despite the recent run up. And it is: technology. Numerous innovations, from GPS-guided tractors to ever better seed stock to irrigation breakthroughs, are constantly increasing the yield a given acre can produce. To give just one cool example, some farms now plant seeds with gel packs that absorb and hold rainfall (that otherwise would run off or evaporate) until the plant needs it. So even if commodity prices do tumble, the land’s economic yield is protected by enhanced output over time, a spectacular natural hedge. And, of course, if do we continue to get the underlying appreciation that has fueled much of the +10% total returns of the past many years, so much the better. (A quick note on political and environmental risk: no, changes in the farm subsidy system– if any– are not likely to change the basic investment thesis here; and yes, crop insurance is a good safeguard against flood and drought). Now, the bad news. It’s not so easy to invest in farms. Do not think for a moment that investing in agricultural companies, or the ETFs that hold them, is a reasonable substitute. Those might be decent choices too, but they do not represent the same basic investment proposition as owning the land itself. And remember, we’re not “playing” a theme here looking for big gains- – we’re making a solid, yield-oriented, purchase-power-protecting allocation. So… where to look? There are numerous, high quality, mid-size investment partnerships out there with strong management teams and reasonable investment minimums. And some wealth management firms have excellent internal teams that will handle the property purchase and management for you through a separately managed account. In either case, you can expect to pay modest management fees, but the expertise is likely worth it. Or, you can go directly to one of many farm brokerages (easy to find online) and have at it… but make sure to watch a few episodes of Green Acres first. To learn more about this and other alternative investment topics, check out my new book, The Alternative Answer. And please follow me on Twitter @bobrice3. Continue reading