Tag Archives: investment
Developers call for land to be set aside in UK for Build to Rent
A group of developers and real estate investors have revealed a three point action plan which they say could see more than 250,000 extra homes built for rent. Called the Better Renting campaign, they have written to the housing minister saying that Build to Rent, where corporates build clusters of homes that are rented and not sold, could help the government deliver its pledge to build a million homes by 2020. The letter claims that traditional house builders are at full capacity and that support for corporate landlords could bring £50 billion of new money into the sector. The letter asks ministers to set aside an agreed proportion of public land for Build to Rent development. Councils and public land owners could generate long term rental income from buildings or land, allowing them to fund under pressure public services. The group also calls on the Chancellor George Osborne not to apply an additional 3% stamp duty charge to professional Build to Rent developments. Last December, he promised to only apply this to buy to let investors, but subsequently reversed this pledge. The group claims the move will dampen investor appetite to build more homes. It could deter further investment which could build more than 250,000 new homes. Finally, the campaign’s letter calls for recognition of Discount Market Rent (DMR) homes as an accepted form of affordable housing. This would allow developers to create subsidised rental homes as part of their development commitments, following successful use of the policy in the London boroughs of Ealing, Greenwich and Brent. A nationwide recognition would deliver more affordable housing. Signatories to the letter include Grainger Plc, Essential Living, LaSalle Investment Management, HUB, Fizzy Living, Real Star, Hermes Investment Management as well as Mishcon de Reya, a leading city law firm. ‘Until we face up to the fact that promoting home ownership at all costs will lead us nowhere, Britain will not overcome its housing shortage. The housing minister has been very supportive of Build to Rent, but what’s crucial is that the prime minister and chancellor recognise the contribution this could make to helping them keep their promises on building a million homes by 2020,’ said Martin Bellinger, chief operating officer at Essential Living. According to Helen Gordon, chief executive at Grainger Plc, pointed out that the form wants to invest in the Build to Rent sector. ‘Our vision is for a better rental market, underpinned by good value for money for our customers, supporting economic growth and housing supply,’ she said. ‘We are looking to invest hundreds of millions of pounds into new rental homes, designed specifically for the renting, which we will directly manage for many years to come. It is important that the Government does all it can to allow us and companies like us to build more homes,’ she added. Chris Taylor, head of private markets at Hermes Investment Management, explained that experience from the United States, Germany and Holland demonstrates the potential capacity… Continue reading
Property prices in Sydney saw a strong surge in May
Residential property prices in capital cities in Australia increased by 1.6% in May and are up by 5% year on year, the latest home value index shows The strong May numbers were largely the result of a surge in Sydney dwelling values which were up 3.1% over the month, according to the data from CoreLogic. Prices also increased strongly in Canberra with month on month growth of 2.5% and were up 1.6% in Melbourne and 2.2% in Hobart. Perth was the only city to record a fall with prices down 2.7%. The CoreLogic combined capitals index has recorded a 5% increase since the beginning of January and as a result has caused the annual trend in capital gains to rebound after conditions tapered since July last year. The annual rate of growth, which recorded a recent trough in December last year at 7.4%, has now rebounded back to 10% as of the end of May. After such a strong performance across the Sydney housing market, the annual rate of growth has moved substantially higher to reach 13.1% per annum after reaching a recent low point of 7.4% per annum growth over the 12 months ending March 2016. Despite Sydney’s bounce in the trend rate of growth, Melbourne’s housing market is still recording the highest annual rate of capital gain at 13.9%. Perth and Darwin remain the only markets to record an annual decline in home values. Perth dwelling values are down 4.2% over the past year and have recorded a peak to current fall of 6.7%. Similarly, Darwin dwelling values fell by 3.5% over the past year and are down 5.5% since peaking two years ago. The current growth cycle has been running for four years now, according to the index report. After capital city prices fell by 7.4% between October 2010 and May 2012, values have since risen by 36.6% over the growth cycle to date. The largest capital gains over the cycle to date have been in Sydney where dwelling values are 57.5% higher followed by Melbourne with a 39.4% capital gain since values started rising. The third strongest performance has been in Brisbane at 18.5%. The rebound in the rate of capital gain during 2016 is supported by other measurements in the market, the report points out. For example, auction clearance rates across the combined capital cities have remained stable and hovered around the high 60% to low 70% range since February this year. Sydney clearance rates remain firm, sitting at around the mid 70% mark over the past three weeks while Melbourne clearance rates now sit in the early 70% range. Continue reading
Survey reveals lack of knowledge in UK about home insurance
Some 1.6 million UK home owners have bought home insurance from their lender and many mistakenly believe they cannot switch for a better deal, according to a new survey. Some 30% or 466,200 households believe their home has to be insured with their mortgage lender as a condition of the loan and 6% were told by their lender that it was a mandatory purchase. On top of this 24% think switching away from their lender’s insurance will invalidate their mortgage, according to the survey from Gocompare Home Insurance. Overall it found that 14% of home owners arranged their home insurance through their mortgage lender and 30%, almost half a million home owners, believed that they had to arrange their home insurance through their mortgage lender as a condition of their mortgage deal. And 24% of borrowers who arranged their insurance with their lender think that switching their insurance to another provider will invalidate their mortgage while 12% say they felt under pressure to buy their lender’s home insurance and 6% said they were told by their mortgage provider that they had to. Protecting a property with adequate buildings insurance, typically against fire, flooding, subsidence and storm damage, is as a requirement made by all mortgage lenders. Buildings insurance provides financial protection for the borrower, and ultimately the lender, from damage to the main structure of the home. While most lenders offer home insurance, borrowers are not obliged to buy it for them. However, the practice of compulsory home insurance tied-in mortgage deals was never formally outlawed despite promises to do so in the late 1990s. When questioned why they had opted to buy their lender’s home insurance, the survey revealed a mixture of misunderstanding, misplaced trust in their mortgage lender and consumer apathy. For example, 14% thought buying their lender’s home insurance might help with their mortgage application, 9% said they didn’t realise they could buy cover elsewhere, 22% said that their lender gave reassurances that the product was good value, 50% think that their mortgage lender provides the best value cover for their home insurance and 49% had opted to do so out of convenience. The survey also found that 72% hadn’t compared products and prices offered by other providers and 34% of home owners who arranged cover through their lender didn’t check cover levels and excesses to make sure they were buying the right policy. According to statistics published earlier this year by the Association of British Insurers, the main reasons for household insurance claims being rejected included the claim value being below the policy excess and the incident not being adequately covered by the policy. ‘We were shocked to find that so many people still think that their mortgage offer is conditional on buying their lender’s home insurance, and that a significant minority are essentially in a mortgage linked insurance trap, believing that switching away from their lender’s insurance will invalidate their mortgage,’ said Ben Wilson from Gocompare Home Insurance. ‘We… Continue reading
