Tag Archives: india
EM Storms Could Spread To Europe
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/03acf9f0-098b-11e3-8b32-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2cXAczb6b By Ralph Atkins in London Periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for sell-off At the start of this year, emerging market turmoil was on few investors’ worry lists. Top preoccupations were US fiscal woes, the rumbling eurozone debt crisis and a possible “hard” landing for China’s economy. Nobody really considered what would happen if all those threats did not materialise. The financial storms hitting India and other developing economies this week are the answer. With the US economy having successfully avoided possible global upsets and growing steadily, the US Federal Reserve wants to wind down its asset purchases, or “quantitative easing”, from as early as next month. As a result bond prices have fallen, and yields risen correspondingly, in developed markets – and the strong flows of capital into emerging markets that had been attracted by higher yields there have gone firmly into reverse. Worst hit have been countries most reliant on capital inflows – those with gaping current account deficits to finance. In India, where the deficit exceeded 5 per cent of gross domestic product last year, the rupee has tumbled to a record low against the dollar. Equity prices have fallen precipitously, while 10-year bond yields have approached 10 per cent, the highest for five years. The good news is that this has not yet spun into a full-blown emerging market crisis, and the Fed can control the pace at which it “tapers” asset purchases. European shares are benefiting as an alternative contrarian trade for investors looking for underrated assets. The bad news is that we are still at the start of the process of exiting global QE and the effects will spread – including, perhaps, to weaker European economies. Much of what is happening in emerging markets is the result of national factors – India’s troubles have been exacerbated by seemingly cack-handed political decisions. It is also true that global investors fell out of love with emerging market equities long before Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman, first hinted at tapering on May 22. Thus the extent to which tapering is causing the emerging market tensions is disputed. But it seems obvious that tapering talk has at least exacerbated the sell-off. Outflows from Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) bond funds have been equivalent to almost a third of assets under management since May 22, according to EPFR, a funds data provider. That compares with just 4 per cent from the start of the year until Mr Bernanke spoke. Moreover, there has been a clear relationship between the size of current account deficits and the extent to which countries have been hit by the financial turmoil – strengthening the argument that it is reversed QE flows that are the main culprit. Indonesia, where the current account also deteriorated sharply last year, has seen some of the sharpest equity price falls. South Africa, Turkey and Brazil have, like India, seen steep rises in bond yields and tumbling dollar exchange rates. Ominously, the lesson of economic history is that when capital inflows go into reverse, the turnround is often abrupt and painful. Nor are surplus countries immune. When emerging market fund managers have to finance sudden large outflows they are forced to sell higher-quality, more liquid assets – and the effects spread. For Europeans, this week’s events are eerily reminiscent of the damage wreaked on the Baltic states that were running massive current account deficits when the global financial crisis erupted in 2007. Eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. For a while, weaker members of the eurozone were protected by the currency union. But then the eurozone itself was almost torn apart as strong capital flows from the continent’s north to the southern periphery went into reverse. Fixed exchange rate regimes sometimes lull investors into a false sense of security by delaying an inevitable correction. This week’s emerging market turmoil will encourage the shift in investor sentiment back towards developed economies, especially those returning to internally driven, self-sustaining growth. The risk for Europe, however, is that periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for a sell-off. If German 10-year Bund yields are rising – they have this week exceeded 1.9 per cent, compared with less than 1.2 per cent in early May – yields below 4.5 per cent on Italian and Spanish equivalents look less compelling. For now, eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. But we are at the start of a long process in which US monetary policy will evolve – with effects nobody can predict with confidence. Continue reading
Forest Real Estate – Dubai Marina Office
Creating a unique name in UAE’s real estate industry by building awareness about eco-living for a better world, Forest Real Estate is your best choice where … Continue reading
There’s Money to Be Made in Food and Agriculture Stocks
By Selena Maranjian July 23, 2013 Exchange-traded funds offer a convenient way to invest in sectors or niches that interest you. If you’d like to add some agriculture-related stocks to your portfolio but don’t have the time or expertise to hand-pick a few, the cutely tickered Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF ( NYSEMKT: MOO ) could save you a lot of trouble. Instead of trying to figure out which companies will perform best , you can use this ETF to invest in lots of them simultaneously. The basics ETFs often sport lower expense ratios than their mutual fund cousins. The Market Vectors ETF’s expense ratio — its annual fee — is 0.54 %, and it recently yielded about 1.8%. This ETF has underperformed the world market over the past three and five years. It’s the future that matters most, though. And as with most investments, of course, we can’t expect outstanding performances in every quarter or year. Investors with conviction need to wait for their holdings to deliver . Why agriculture? It’s hard to say with much certainty what many industries will look like in the future, but we can be pretty sure that our planet’s growing population will continue to require food. More than a handful of agriculture-related companies had strong performances over the past year. Archer Daniels Midland ( NYSE: ADM ) , for example, surged 37%, and is admired for its vertical integration, featuring farms, processing plants, and more. Its last quarter featured revenue slightly up, but earnings down, in part due to last year’s droughts. The company remains a solid dividend payer , though (recently yielding 2.1%), and is looking to expand in Asia via its purchase of GrainCorp , Australia’s leading agribusiness. It has also been upgraded from underweight to neutral by analysts at JPMorgan Chase , who think it will benefit from lower corn prices, but it still features low margins and doesn’t seem very undervalued right now. ADM is considering selling its cocoa business amid falling cocoa prices. Deere ( NYSE: DE ) gained 14% and yields 2.4%. The stock seems attractively valued, with its current and forward P/E ratios of 10 and 9, respectively, well below its five-year average of 15. The company is posting robust growth, though its free cash flow has been in the red. Deere expects continued equipment sales growth , particularly from Latin America, but construction and forestry sales are projected to fall this year. Deere faces competition, too, such as from Japan, and some are looking for cost-cutting from the company. Other companies didn’t do as well last year, but could see their fortunes change in the coming years. Fertilizer giant PotashCorp ( NYSE: POT ) dropped 13% and yields 3.7%. (Its dividend has been hiked 25% this year and some 700% over the past few years.) With its current and forward P/E ratios well below its five-year average, the stock seems appealingly priced . Bulls like its low-cost structure and solid profit margins. Some of its fate is tied to massive developing economies such as China, where growth has slowed, and India, where there is reportedly a potash oversupply . Potash carries a lot more debt than cash, but it’s also generating more than $1 billion in free cash flow annually. Some worry about major fertilizer Brazil’s plans to wean itself off foreign fertilizer, but others doubt that it will succeed anytime soon. Fellow fertilizer concern CF Industries ( NYSE: CF ) shed 9%, and looks attractive with its forward P/E ratio below 7. Like Potash and others, the nitrogen and phosphate specialist may be hurt if Brazil stops importing fertilizer, but that’s not likely to happen soon. Meanwhile, some peers may be hurt by changes in India, but CF is better positioned there due to its product and sales mix. It has also been benefiting from low natural gas prices, as that’s used in nitrogen fertilizer. Rising nitrogen prices have helped , too. The big picture Demand for agriculture isn’t going away anytime soon. A well-chosen ETF can grant you instant diversification across any industry or group of companies — and make investing in and profiting from it that much easier. This agriculture ETF is quite intriguing, but there are others you might find even more compelling. To learn more about a few ETFs that have great promise for delivering profits to shareholders, check out The Motley Fool’s special free report ” 3 ETFs Set to Soar .” Just click here to access it now. Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool owns shares of CF Industries Holdings and JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy . Continue reading