Tag Archives: greenpeace
Biomass: Wood Pellets Muscle In On Old Role Of Coal
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b83d5050-c3a3-11e2-aa5b-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2VGGRqFHl By Guy Chazan Drax, the UK power supplier, is pushing ahead with what is shaping up to be a huge bet on biomass. The company, which has a big coal-fired power plant in Yorkshire, has launched a £750m investment programme to convert three of its six units to wood pellets, a renewable source of energy. It started commissioning the first converted unit in April. For Dorothy Thompson, chief executive, the attraction of biomass is obvious. “It’s a lot cheaper than offshore wind, there is security of supply and it’s more flexible,” she says. The pellets burnt in biomass boilers are made from the “cheapest part of the forestry industry product – harvested residues and thinnings” – and a “supply chain is developing”. Drax’s interest in biomass is part of a wider industry trend. New EU emissions regulations have put pressure on many of the continent’s old coal-fired power stations but some operators have realised they can keep the plants alive by converting their boilers from coal to wood pellets. The discovery of biomass has given a new lease of life to ageing coal assets that would otherwise have been shuttered. Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) says between 3.6 and 6.8 gigawatts of biomass generating capacity could be commissioned between 2012 and 2016, though it warned that slow governmental decisions on future subsidies “risks unnerving manufacturers and investors”. Interest has been driven by EU laws that stipulate member states must source 20 per cent of their energy from renewables by 2020. That will not present much of a problem for Germany, with its massive investments in wind and solar power. But the UK and others may struggle, hence the embracing of coal-to-biomass conversion. “It’s an easy, quick and capital-lite way to meet the renewables targets,” says Harry Boyle, an analyst at BNEF. “Coal plants are already connected to the grid and what’s required are relatively minor modifications to an existing asset.” Biomass is also a consistent source of supply, in contrast to the intermittency of wind and solar. Such considerations have pushed the UK to create a generous subsidy regime for the fuel. Previously, developers were awarded half a renewables obligation certificate (ROC) for co-firing coal with biomass. Now, the government is offering operators a whole ROC if they fully convert their boilers to biomass from coal. It was this decision that underpinned Drax’s big investment programme. As a result of this and other subsidies, generating capacity is expected to grow quickly across Europe. BNEF says European pellet demand will rise to 25m-30m tonnes by 2020, up from about 12m tonnes now. Most of that will be imported from outside the EU. Yet biomass remains much more controversial than wind and solar. This is partly because when wood is burnt, it releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere – just like fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal. Advocates like Ms Thompson stress that these emissions are neutralised by regrowth in the forest from which the wood was harvested. “You’re not using trapped carbon.” Partly because of that, she says, the carbon footprint of biomass is “70-80 per cent smaller than that of coal”. Environmentalists are unconvinced. A recent study put out by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds together with Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth says it may take “many years for the end-of-pipe emissions to be neutralised” by regrowth of forests. It disputes the industry’s assertion that pellets used in power generation are made of residues from timber production, saying there is evidence that whole trees are often used. The study claims that the UK government’s proposed sustainability standards for biomass will not prevent wood being used that comes from forests “where management regimes cause problems for biodiversity”. The report’s authors say there is a risk the UK will be “locked into financially supporting an industry that results in increasing greenhouse gas emissions and other serious sustainability issues”. Biomass developers face other difficulties, aside from the objections of green groups. A big challenge is finding enough pellets to supply their hungry biomass boilers. “It takes time to build up the supply chain,” says Ms Thompson. “Each [converted] unit requires 2.3m tonnes of biomass a year – and the total global cross-sea trade is only about 7m tonnes.” So a chunk of Drax’s £750m investment will go on building a wood pellet factory in the southeast of the US to fill Drax boilers. Some people worry about the carbon emissions involved in transporting pellets from the US to Europe. BNEF’s Harry Boyle says the problem is not necessarily the emissions released by tankers bringing huge cargoes of pellets across the Atlantic, but those of trucks transporting the wood from pellet factories hundreds of miles to ports in the US. Continue reading
China Unveils Details Of Pilot Carbon-Trading Programme
Nation’s first trading scheme in the southern city of Shenzhen will cover 638 companies when it begins next month Jonathan Kaiman in Beijing guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 22 May 2013 16.38 BST China has unveiled details of its first pilot carbon-trading programme, which will begin next month in the southern city of Shenzhen. The trading scheme will cover 638 companies responsible for 38% of the city’s total emissions, the Shenzhen branch of the powerful National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced on Wednesday. The scheme will eventually expand to include transportation, manufacturing and construction companies. Shenzhen is one of seven designated areas in which the central government plans to roll out experimental carbon trading programmes before 2014. China is the world’s biggest carbon emitter and burns almost as much coal as the rest of the world’s countries combined. Li Yan, Greenpeace east Asia’s climate and energy campaign manager, said that the pilot programmes will inform the central government on how to motivate local authorities to adopt low-carbon policies. The push to reduce carbon emissions coincides with the newly installed leadership’s effort to tackle the country’s dire air pollution problem, which has emerged as a source of widespread anger and frustration in recent months. “Having a mid-term strategy, and trying to prepare years ahead, is actually in line with China’s interests and its political and social priorities,” she said. On Monday, the Chinese newspaper 21st Century Business Herald reported that the NDRC has discussed implementing a national system to control the intensity and volume of carbon emissions by 2020. The agency expects China to reach its carbon emissions peak by 2025, five years earlier than many recent estimates, according to unnamed sources quoted in the article. At a recent climate change meeting, the agency “announced that it’s currently researching and calculating a timetable for the greenhouse gas emissions peak, and will vigorously strive to implement a total emissions control scheme during the ’13th five-year plan’ period (from 2016-2020),” the paper quoted a NDRC official, also unnamed, as saying. “The NDRC is looking for a national cap, but nobody knows exactly when that is going to happen,” said Wu Changhua, greater China director of the Climate Group. “There’s still a lot of work to be done.” The EU’s carbon trading scheme, the world’s largest, has suffered repeated setbacks in recent months. In April, MEPs voted against a proposed reform aimed to raise the price of carbon, which has been diluted by an overabundance of permits. Read the full article at: http://www.guardian….n#ixzz2Uh94cM8l Continue reading
Renewable Energy Firms Accuse Activists Of Scaremongering Over Biomass
Trade association tells Greenpeace, RSPB and Friends of the Earth they are spreading misinformation over use of fuels Fiona Harvey , environment correspondent The Guardian , Thursday 2 May 2013 Drax, the UK’s biggest power station, which is converting three of its six 660MW units to burn biomass. Photograph: John Giles/PA Archive/Press Association Ima A major row has broken out between green campaigners and companies using wood, straw, waste and other “biomass” fuels to run power stations over how environmentally friendly such fuels are. The Renewable Energy Association has disclosed to the Guardian a letter accusing some of the UK’s biggest green NGOs of scaremongering over their vocal opposition to the use of biomass in generating energy. Gaynor Hartnell, chief executive of the trade association, which represents the biomass and other renewable energy industries, wrote to the heads of Greenpeace, RSPB and Friends of the Earth, accusing them of spreading “misinformation” and using data that is “not science” and arguments that are “half-baked”. She told them: “Some of what has gone on recently is not worthy of your stature … The companies we represent are engaged in practical actions to reduce carbon emissions, improve forestry management, protect biodiversity and provide energy.” She urged the green campaigners to work together in a “robust dialogue”. The letter was sent on 18 March, and requested a meeting with the organisations that has not yet taken place. Using biomass to generate electricity can produce less carbon dioxide than burning fossil fuels, particularly coal, and has been encouraged by successive governments as a way to bring down greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass is made from living materials, usually plants, that absorb carbon dioxide during their life and act as carbon stores. When the material is burnt, the stored carbon is returned to the atmosphere, but this does not represent a net gain in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere in the way that burning coal or gas does. Some biomass is grown for the purpose of burning, but many of the potential materials would otherwise go to waste, including waste wood, forestry offcuts and straw, which when discarded decompose and emit methane, a greenhouse gas 20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. However, depending on how the way in which the biomass is used, burning it can give rise to soot, which can contribute to global warming if it falls and discolours snow in the Arctic and other icy regions, turning the ice black and causing it to absorb more heat from the sun. There are currently 20 biomass-burning power stations in the UK, producing about 1GW of power or the equivalent of a large coal-fired power station, with another 29 – about 5GW – in planning and a further eight in the proposal stages. Some coal-burning power stations are being converted to run wholly or in part on biomass, including Drax, the UK’s biggest power station and biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, which is in the process of converting three of its six 660MW units to burn biomass. Drax said its biomass would come from sustainably managed forests in the US, where replanting exceeds the timber harvest. Companies using biomass receive renewable energy subsidies and need to surrender fewer carbon permits under the EU’s emissions trading scheme. Continue reading