Tag Archives: financial
Luxembourg: The EU’s Top Tax Haven
Switzerland is a well-known hideaway for assets from around the world, but the country does not belong to the European Union. Within the EU, Luxembourg is the largest tax haven – and operates fully within the law. What do investors want? Plenty of security for their money, high returns and the lowest tax rates possible. These conditions aren’t just found along the white beaches of the Caribbean. Tax havens are also thriving in Europe, says Reinhard Kilmer, a German tax fraud investigator. “We don’t have to look to the Caribbean. We can also step outside our own front door,” Kilmer said in a television interview, adding that Great Britain protects the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, France has Monaco, and Europe still has issues with Luxembourg, Switzerland and Austria. The yields are perhaps not as high in such places as on the Virgin Islands, but the security cannot be beat, Kilmer concluded. The leading haven within the European Union is the tiny Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, a founding member of the EU. But the country’s finance minister, Luc Frieden, rejects the notion of it being a tax haven. Deutsche Bank is one of 141 banks in the tiny country “We are a European center of finance, and we don’t encourage anyone to engage in tax evasion,” Frieden has said repeatedly, most recently over the weekend in an interview with the Sunday edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine daily. Luxembourg’s government says that 141 banks from 26 countries have settled there. More transparency? For decades, Luxembourg has cultivated its reputation as an investor’s safe haven. Around 2.1 trillion euros ($2.73 trillion) are held by Luxembourg’s investment funds, according to an estimate by the financial consulting firm Ogier. Taxes are very low on these funds, leading many international companies to open subsidiaries in Luxembourg in order to have their profits taxed cheaply by the miniature country. That is entirely legal in Europe. Money from abroad provides Luxembourgers with the highest per capita income in the EU, so it’s no wonder that residents defend their business model. Finance Minister Luc Frieden also does not want to shake things up by threatening the sense of security felt among companies and investors there. Sven Giegold, a member of the European Parliament and a finance expert within the Green Party, has called for more transparency when it comes to companies’ tax models. “A company should have to make clear in its balance sheets how many subsidiaries it has, how much in profits it is earning and where as well as how much it’s paying in taxes,” Giegold said, arguing that such a move would allow journalists and voters to determine whether the relationship between earnings and taxes paid is appropriate. “Then this whole tax shuffle would be transparent,” the parliamentarian said. Luc Frieden – finance minister in tax paradise? Luc Frieden told the Frankfurter Allgemeine that he is prepared to think about whether records of interest earned by private investors should in the future be automatically forwarded to the tax authorities in the investors’ home countries. He was sharply criticized in Luxembourg for saying so, and the youth wing of center-right Democratic Party in Luxembourg issued a statement demanding that bank secrecy be maintained. Until now, Luxembourg and Austria, the tax haven in the Alps, have blocked automatic sharing of data on investment returns and taxes in the European Union. European Commissioner for Taxation Algirdas Semeta described that practice last year as “completely unfair.” Small states need ‘large capital reserves’ The EU is not really responsible for taxation policy, which is largely left to the member states. The idea is that it’s desirable for there to be competition among the various tax models. Malta, for example, does not tax companies at all, while Cyprus taxes them at ten percent and Ireland at 12.5 percent. For years, finance ministers have sought to agree to a shared basis model when it comes to what types of wealth and income should be subject to taxation. Guntram Wolff supports policies of tax transparency In terms of financial politics, it’s not necessary for tax models to be uniform, said Guntram Wolff, an economist with the think tank Bruegel in Brussels. What’s essential, he said, is that the rules are clear: “I think tax transparency is crucial. Tax havens in the European bloc are in no way desirable. That cannot be the case because then one country is really operating its tax policy and banks at the cost of the others.” When a storm emerges over a tax haven, as recently happened in Cyprus, then other European countries may get called in to foot the bill. Government spokespeople in Luxembourg and Malta reject comparisons with Cyprus. But the banks – even in Luxembourg or Malta – could one day fall into trouble, believes Thomas Meyer, chief economist at Deutsche Bank. In an interview with online portal EU Observer, he said: “Even with the best oversight, banks can get into trouble. And when a state is too small in comparison with its banking sector, then it will go bankrupt.” In the case of Cyprus, however, EU members are rescuing it with ten billion euros. In Cyprus, the banks were worth seven times as much as the country’s GDP. In Luxembourg, they’re worth 22 times more. Meyer believes small states should maintain larger reserves of their own capital, citing Switzerland as an example that is paving the way here. In Luxembourg, Austria and other financial tax havens, Meyer says, there’s a preference for using the EU as a form of insurance. Defining tax havens Tax havens can be found well beyond the Caribbean A speaker for the EU Commission has noted that the member states have until now been unable to agree as to what constitutes a tax haven. If one applies the standards of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Paris, then no European country can be called a tax haven. Low tax rates in one country that can lead to avoiding higher taxes elsewhere is not an illegal practice – at most just an affront to some people’s sense of justice. Finance ministers from Luxembourg, Latvia or Slovakia, where rates are lower for companies than they are in Germany or France, argue in response that high tax countries could always lower their rates in order to attract investors and new companies. The British NGO Tax Justice Network publishes a list of tax havens that weights the size of the financial marketplace as well as the level of bank secrecy. Using this index, Switzerland is tax haven number one, followed by the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg. Germany comes in at number nine. Billions owned by foreign investors are housed in Germany, as well, and the reticence of German banks toward tax authorities in Russia or Arabic states makes the country attractive to many, notes the Tax Justice Network. Continue reading
Commercial Property Deals In Ireland To Triple This Year-Savills
By Jemima Kelly LONDON, July 11 | Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:05am EDT (Reuters) – Real estate investors will triple spending on Irish commercial property this year, in a bet the country’s tentative economic recovery will gather pace, research showed on Thursday. Total sales are likely to exceed 1.5 billion euros ($1.9 billion) versus 576 million in 2012, property consultant Savills said. It would be the highest amount since 1.8 billion euros in 2007, before the global financial crash sent values plunging by up to half in a country that, together with Spain , suffered Europe’s worst property crash. Some investors have said they see value in Irish real estate. “After steep falls in property values, Ireland is now one of the highest-yielding markets in the developed world,” said David Skinner, real estate chief investment officer at Aviva Investors , which owns 28 billion euros of property in Europe. “Irish real estate looks attractive for long-term investors with a moderate risk appetite.” Euro zone policymakers have hailed Ireland as a success story versus other bailed-out countries such as Greece and Portugal , where political instability and biting austerity measures are hampering economic growth. Ireland is due to exit its EU/IMF bailout programme later this year and is targeting growth of 1.3 percent in 2013, though the country said last month it had slid back into recession. Its patchy recovery has not dented overseas interest from companies like Deutsche Bank’s property arm, JPMorgan and AXA Real Estate, who are chasing a relatively small number of high-quality properties in the capital Dublin. Under pressure from investors to find high returns, some say Dublin looks a good bet versus safer but lower-yielding markets like London, Paris and Frankfurt. Yields, or the annual rent as a percentage of the property’s value, for the best Dublin offices are about 6.25 percent versus about 4 percent in London’s West End, one of Europe’s most in-demand markets. Tenant demand is also on the rise and Dublin office rents rose in March for the first time since the financial crisis. Helped by Ireland’s low corporation tax rate of 12.5 percent, companies like Google , Facebook and Ebay are driving demand. Continue reading
Carbon Market Slump Worries Policy Makers
Jul 10, 2013 From wire reports CLEAR SKIES: Emissions prices in the $72 billion cap-and-trade program have fallen more than 70 percent in the past 4 years. VILNIUS – The European Parliament approved a plan intended to reduce a record glut of permits and increase prices in the world’s biggest carbon market after they slumped to an all-time low, reports Bloomberg. European Union carbon allowances rose the most in two months after lawmakers in Strasbourg, France, endorsed a revised version of a plan known as backloading advanced by the European Commission, the region’s regulatory arm. That was the Parliament’s second verdict on the measure, which would delay the sale of some permits to support prices after it blocked the plan in April, triggering a 45 percent slump. “It’s a good signal that Parliament voted this through today,” Oeystein Loeseth, chief executive officer of Vattenfall, Europe’s biggest emitter after RWE, said by telephone. “When you take volumes out of the market, prices will increase.” Emissions prices in the $72 billion cap-and-trade program have lost more than 70 percent in the past four years. The euro area’s record-long recession reduced demand for pollution rights and worsened a glut that swelled to about 2 billion metric tons in 2012, according to the EU. That’s almost equal to the region’s annual limit imposed on 12,000 power plants and factories. The caps were set before the financial crisis. EU allowances for delivery in December gained 9.3 percent, the biggest jump since May 3, to close at 4.69 euros a ton on the ICE Futures Europe exchange, after falling on July 3 by as much as 24 percent before the vote. The contract slumped to a record 2.46 euros on April 17, the day after the Parliament blocked the emergency fix in its first plenary vote. Lawmakers endorsed the plan 344 to 311, with 46 abstentions, according to the voting result. “The backloading plan has passed its largest hurdle so far, but auction curbs are still far from certain and unlikely to start before mid-2014,” Itamar Orlandi, an analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance in London, said on July 3 by e-mail. “The focus will now shift from Strasbourg to Berlin, as Germany’s decision on the plan will determine whether it can go ahead.” Traders will now focus on positions of national governments, whose consent is also needed to enact the plan, according to Ingo Ramming, co-head of commodity solutions at Commerzbank in London. “Markets are hoping on a fast-track decision to regain confidence in the EU emissions trading scheme,” he said July 3 by e-mail. “We would expect that prices are capped in the mid-term around 6 euros on the back of uncertainties on the European economy, supply from industrials and auctioning.” Permits may rise to 5.20 euros after the approval, according to the median forecast of nine analysts and traders surveyed by Bloomberg News before the vote. The assembly rejected amendments seeking an earlier return of the delayed permits to the market and earmarking 600 million allowances for a special fund to promote low-emissions technology. It backed a proposal to cap backloading at 900 million permits and limit the planned intervention in the carbon market to an exceptional, one-time move. The delay in sales of permits may be enacted under the condition that it has “no significant impact” on companies prone to relocating production to regions without emission curbs, lawmakers decided. “This is more bullish than the market had anticipated,” Konrad Hanschmidt, an analyst at BNEF, said on July 3 by e-mail. The backloading strategy has divided policy makers and industry. Opponents of the fix, ranging from Poland to steelmaker ArcelorMittal, say it pushes up energy costs during an economic slump. The EU commission and companies including Royal Dutch Shell say intervention is needed to bolster prices that are too low to stimulate investment in clean technology. “Yes!” EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said on her Twitter Inc. account. “Despite heavy-handed lobbying, and after very substantial debate, the European Parliament supports the backloading proposal.” The decision in favor of backloading on July 3 authorizes Matthias Groote, the lawmaker overseeing the measure in the Parliament, to start talks with representatives of national governments on the final wording of the legislation in a fast-track procedure. The outcome of the talks will need official approval by the Parliament and EU ministers. Lithuania, which holds the EU rotating presidency and will represent member states in the negotiations, is ready for a “constructive dialog” on the carbon fix, the Baltic country’s Environment Minister Valentinas Mazuronis said in an e-mailed statement. He said he was confident the measure can be dealt with “effectively and expeditiously.” The Parliament’s decision to block the faster return of permits to the market and the creation of the innovation fund will make talks with member states easier, Peter Liese, a German Christian Democrat member of the Parliament, said after the vote. “It’ll go very fast after the German elections,” he said in an interview. Member states may decide about their position by “early fall,” according to Arunas Vinciunas, Lithuania’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU. While most EU countries favor backloading, they are short of the qualified majority needed to approve the proposal because several nations, including Germany, remain undecided. Chancellor Angela Merkel said in May she hoped that Europe’s biggest economy would be able to tackle the plan soon after elections on Sept. 22. “It is crucial to get structural reforms quickly off the ground to ensure the emissions trading system will be sustainable and predictable,” Bernhard Guenther, chief financial officer of RWE, said on July 3 in an interview. “We need to know what the political framework for investments in 2020 and ahead will look like and which climate and reduction targets have to be achieved.” Continue reading