Tag Archives: development

The Secret World Of Tax Havens

An anonymous source has provided extensive insights into a worldwide network of tax evaders. Media in more than 30 countries are currently sifting through a mountain of data. 260 gigabytes of documents – that’s the printed equivalent of 500,000 copies of the Bible. This is the massive amount of data that was passed on more than a year ago by an anonymous whistleblower to the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) in Washington. More than two million emails and other confidential documents sketch a picture of a dubious shadow world. More than 130,000 people from 170 countries are alleged to have secreted their money in tax havens. Analyzing the data is a mammoth task that is still nowhere near completion. Challenge for computer forensics experts The anonymous source secretly lifted the data from two company servers and transferred it via the Internet. “Unfortunately, in order to protect the source, it’s not possible to say anything more about exactly how this was done, but it’s clear that there was a substantial leak,” says German data journalist Sebastian Mondial, who is one of those analyzing the material. This means that at a certain point these companies’ secrets were accessible in such a way that someone was able to make a copy, Mondial explained in an interview with DW. Germany’s Süddeutsche Zeitung daily writes that much of the data was not very well organized, and that some of the documents first had to be converted so they could be read by machine. “We were lucky that we had some specific forensic software that’s usually used by criminologists,” says Mondial. This, he explains, made it possible to scan these databases and examine them to find out things like what connections existed between pieces of data, when documents were created, when emails were sent and who received blind copies of emails. The Virgin Islands are just one of many tax havens Havens of tranquility and tax evasion The British Virgin Islands, the Cook Islands, the Seychelles, Panama: All of them have something very attractive to offer to certain companies and private individuals – anonymity. “‘Come to us and you won’t have to worry about the tax office finding out.’ This is the kind of slogan these so-called offshore islands use to attract rich people,” says Thomas Eigenthaler from the German financial managers’ union (DSTG). He explains that the tax evasion is made easier by the fact that the taxpayers don’t have to deal with it themselves. A whole industry has sprung up to advise them and offer tailor-made solutions. Sebastian Mondial adds that many tax havens don’t even keep any kind of register with information on company owners or capital. The EU estimates that every year around a trillion euros in tax revenue is lost through tax evasion or tax avoidance. According to a study by the non-governmental organization Tax Justice Network, a fortune estimated at between 21 to 32 trillion dollars is stashed away in tax havens. By comparison, in 2011 the gross domestic product of the United States was around 15.1 trillion dollars. The figure doesn’t even include non-financial assets and gold held abroad, foreign properties, or luxury yachts sailing under foreign flags. “According to my colleagues working on the project, there’s a particularly clever trick they pull when someone is sued by an offshore company. They agree on a settlement, and the complaint is dropped,” explains Sebastian Mondial. Then the settlement money, which, as part of a lawsuit, does not have to be taxed, is transferred to the offshore account. There are other tricks, too. For example, a company can set up a subsidiary in a tax haven to deal with its foreign operations, thereby avoiding paying tax on foreign profits. Offshore firms often are little more than a letter box Is Germany also a tax haven? Private individuals resident in Germany have to pay tax of up to 45 percent on their earnings. Companies whose main office is in Germany have to pay corporate tax and business tax. But in Germany too there are loopholes that the cunning can take advantage of. “If a German-based business seeks advice from an offshore company, the offshore company issues an invoice, and the money is transferred. To the tax office, this looks like a perfectly normal transaction,” says Mondial. However, it means that the money has been moved out of the country, and no further taxes will be paid on it. According to German law the burden of proof lies with the tax office, not with the companies. And this burden is too heavy for the German system to bear, Eigenthaler says: “We don’t have the capacity to do all the checks. Sometimes we wait years for an answer from overseas authorities. But there’s also a lack of political will. I always have the sense that people at the top are being too lax in their pursuit of tax evaders.” Furthermore, the influence of the German state ends at the border. “If money is transferred out of Germany to another country, the German treasury has no way of locating it – unless Germany has a tax agreement with the relevant state that includes the exchange of information,” Eigenthaler explains. But why would somewhere like the Cayman Islands have an interest in torpedoing its own business model by signing such an agreement? And as Eigenthaler points out, even if an agreement were reached, it doesn’t mean it would necessarily be followed to the letter. The data leak and its consequences For years now international organizations like the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) have been trying to establish measures against tax fraud and standardize regulations. According to the OECD, progress has been made since a blacklist was published in 2009 naming four countries as tax havens. 700 agreements were reached regarding the exchange of information, and around 40 judicial verdicts have led to some changes in the law. Might the revelations contained in these databases be of assistance in the international fight against tax fraudsters? Yes, but only indirectly, according to the computer forensics journalist Sebastian Mondial. He says he hopes that the actual data will never be published. The point of the exercise is not simply to put all of these firms’ data on the Internet and let everyone look at it to see who has transferred how much money, or who owns which companies. Rather, says Mondial, “The lawmakers and the respective countries must somehow find a way of establishing transparency.” Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Secret World Of Tax Havens

Carbon Credits Surge to Six-Month High as EU Refines Eligibility

By Mathew Carr – Jul 18, 2013 United Nations Emission Reduction Units surged 39 percent after Europe specified which credits are ineligible for use in its carbon market, the world’s biggest. ERUs for December jumped as high as 25 euro cents ($0.33) a metric ton, the highest since Jan. 31, on the ICE Futures Europe exchange in London . The European Commission, the bloc’s regulatory arm, upgraded its carbon registry yesterday to clarify which offsets can be used to meet emissions obligations. ERUs fell to a record low in May after the European Union said it may restrict the use of some offsets from countries including Russia and Ukraine should they fail to adopt new carbon goals as of this year. The credits, created from carbon-reducing projects in developed nations and emerging countries, may now narrow the price gap with more expensive Certified Emission Reductions from developing countries, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The majority of ERUs issued since the start of the year are “likely to be confirmed as eligible” because they have been certified by an audit firm, Richard Chatterton, a London-based analyst for New Energy Finance, said in an e-mailed note. ERUs were trading at 22 euro cents a ton at 1:55 p.m. in London, while CERs fell 1.9 percent to 52 euro cents. Factories, power stations and airlines in the EU market can use either CERs or ERUs to match a limited portion of their emissions obligations. “The difference between the CER and ERU price will continue to narrow as the market gains confidence that ERUs will ultimately be able to be exchanged for EU allowances,” Chatterton said. Price Plunge ERUs plunged to a record 6 cents on May 1 amid a surplus of carbon permits in Europe, where slowing economic growth has damped demand for the credits. EU lawmakers are still debating a plan to temporarily reduce supply and boost prices. EU carbon allowances rose 1 percent to 4.17 euros a ton. The UN 1997 Kyoto Protocol supports the development of carbon-cutting projects by awarding investors with ERUs or CERs that can be sold to companies and governments with pollution caps. One credit is equivalent to a one-ton reduction of carbon dioxide. To contact the reporter on this story: Mathew Carr in London at m.carr@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Lars Paulsson at lpaulsson@bloomberg.net Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, London, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Carbon Credits Surge to Six-Month High as EU Refines Eligibility

UK Woodland Carbon Code launched on Markit Registry

18 JULY 2013NEWS RELEASE No: 16000 UK Woodland Carbon Code launched on Markit Registry The United Kingdom’s Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) has been launched on the Markit Environmental Registry, enhancing transparency and accountability in the trade in British Woodland Carbon Units. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestered, or absorbed, by WCC-validated woodlands in the UK can be traded, and the development enables changes of ownership of each tonne to be tracked. The registry will also record when projects are registered and credits are listed, and when carbon units have been “used” by a company in its carbon account. Forestry Minister David Heath, who spoke at the launch event in London, said, “The Woodland Carbon Code provides an authoritative means of assurance to those who wish to invest in new woodland planting to compensate for some of their unavoidable greenhouse gas emissions. By investing in new woodlands validated as meeting the code’s standards, they receive assurance that their investment will be wisely spent on well managed, sustainable woodlands which really will deliver the carbon benefits claimed.” Units of carbon sequestered by Code-validated woodlands are accurately measured and recorded by a robust carbon-accounting system, and Mr Heath added, “The Code’s launch on the Markit Environmental Registry takes that process an important step further by allowing anyone to see who owns individual units of carbon. It also tracks changes in ownership and, importantly, use of carbon units. “It also adds assurance to carbon buyers by tracking forwards sales of carbon units in long-term woodland carbon projects. This brings welcome clarity, transparency and accountability to the developing woodland carbon market in the UK. “By enhancing the attractiveness of private investment in woodland establishment, this initiative has the potential to make a valuable contribution to our priority goals of growing the rural economy and improving the environment for everyone.” Kathy Benini, managing director of the Markit Environmental Registry, said: “It is an honour to work with the Forestry Commission and provide the infrastructure for this important initiative. “Our registry is a centrepiece of environmental programmes worldwide, and we look forward to providing the tools needed to create a transparent and efficient market for credits in the innovative Woodland Carbon Code programme.” The Markit Environmental Registry also provides an introductory mechanism for bringing together buyers and sellers of woodland carbon units, although it is not a trading platform. The WCC is administered by the Forestry Commission, and further information is available from www.forestry.gov.uk/carboncode . The Markit Environmental Registry provides infrastructure to the global carbon, water and biodiversity markets, enabling participants to track environmental projects, and issue, transact and retire serialised environmental credits. It lists 150 million environmental credits across 20 market-based standards and programmes for users in nearly 80 countries. Further information is available from www.markit.com . NOTES TO EDITOR: CO 2 is the most common of the greenhouse gases causing the atmospheric warming which is changing Earth’s climate. Growing trees sequester, or absorb, CO 2 from the atmosphere, and use carbon atoms to form wood while emitting oxygen back to the atmosphere. From April 2013, UK-quoted companies have been required to report their gross CO 2 emissions. Under the Government’s Environmental Reporting Guidelines (including greenhouse gas emissions), all companies have an opportunity to report verified carbon units created through carbon sequestration in WCC-verified woodland creation projects. (Validated projects must be ‘verified’ after five years, and then at least every 10 years to check that sequestration targets are being met.) Companies can invest directly in woodland establishment projects on their own land, or by buying the rights to the carbon sequestered in woodlands established by others. They can buy units before they are created and verified, but they cannot report them until after they have been verified. Traders of woodland carbon must be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority. A total of 133 projects were registered (notified intention to seek validation) under the code at 30 June 2013, covering an area of 14,200 hectares and projected to sequester 5.2 million tonnes of CO 2 . Of these, 42 had been validated, covering 2100 hectares and projected to sequester 1.0 million tonnes of CO 2 , comprising 256,000 tonnes in England, 662,000 tonnes in Scotland and 33,000 tonnes in Wales. No projects have yet been validated in Northern Ireland. When companies ‘use’ verified units of CO 2 , for example, in an annual environmental report or in claims of carbon neutrality, this is demonstrated in the registry by moving units to their ‘retired’ (or used) account. Projects can only be validated under the Code if they meet its rigorous requirements for sound forest management, sustainability and carbon ‘accounting’. Project proposals are audited by independent certification companies approved by the UK Accreditation Service. Once registered, a proposal is audited against the standards required by the Code, and if it satisfies the requirements it is ‘validated’. Validation provides evidence of the quality of the proposal, not only in carbon terms, but also in sustainable forest management terms, and is critical for attracting investors. Woodland established under the Code must attain high standards of forest management in line with the UK Forestry Standard (UKFS) and its associated Climate Change Guidelines for Forestry. The UKFS sets out the government vision of sustainable forest management, and is the ‘yardstick’ used by all four governments in the UK when assessing applications for forestry grants, tree felling licences and approvals of forest design plans. About 13 per cent of the UK’s land area is covered by woodland, which is more than double the woodland cover of 100 years ago. MEDIA CONTACT: Charlton Clark, 0131 314 6500 e-mail: charlton.clark@forestry.gsi.gov.uk Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, London, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on UK Woodland Carbon Code launched on Markit Registry