Tag Archives: denmark
We’re Putting A Price On Carbon, But Is It Making A Difference?
More than 20% of global emissions are now either taxed or traded. But the question remains: will adding economic incentives to cleaner energy actually work? Putting a price on carbon emissions is seen as crucial to curbing climate change. And the good news is that much of the world is doing just that (though not the U.S.). A new report from the World Bank identifies 40 national, and 20 sub-national, mechanisms globally. The European Union, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand all now have emissions trading systems, or are implementing them. Other countries, like Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Japan, Norway, and South Africa have (or are implementing) carbon taxes. And then there are regional trading initiatives, such are those in California and Quebec. The fact that so many carbon pricing schemes have emerged shows a political will to mitigate greenhouse gases. Altogether, current schemes cover more than 20% of global emissions. And with China, Brazil and Chile all considering carbon trading, the prospect is for far more to be covered–perhaps up to 50%. “The fact that so many carbon pricing schemes have emerged shows a political will to mitigate greenhouse gases as countries increasingly use carbon pricing to deliver benefits both to our climate and to a sustainable economy,” says Joëlle Chassard, of the World Bank’s Carbon Finance Unit. “A transition towards a new generation of carbon markets is in the making.” What is more, the World Bank sees hopeful signs in links between schemes: for example, between E.U. and Australian systems, and California’s and Quebec’s. In time, such relationships could be a “step towards establishing a global carbon market,” it says. And, newer entrants are learning from earlier mistakes. The price of carbon in the EU’s system has collapsed several times, notably during the recession. So, the new schemes are putting in “price floors,” or stopping participants from hoarding allowances (a major problem in Europe). Still, the Bank isn’t exactly confident about averting dangerous global warming–which is the question that matters. “The international community has agreed to limit the increase in average global temperature to 2 degrees Celsius (°C) above pre-industrial levels,” it says. “The current level of action puts us on a pathway towards a 3.5–4°C warmer world by the end of this century.” And, the effectiveness of mechanisms like carbon trading remains in doubt. Emissions in Europe–our best test case–have fallen. But this was in a faltering economy, when businesses and individuals use less energy. A price in itself is meaningless; what matters is the number. So, it’s good news that more of the world is pricing carbon. But we should be wary about banking the outcome. http://www.fastcoexist.com/ Continue reading
Are MEPs Ready To Deliver Carbon Backloading Compromise?
Eight MEPs from ALDE group in European Parliament also call for urgent structural reform to the Emissions Trading System By Jessica Shankleman 17 Jun 2013 MEPs in the European Parliament will this week decide whether to water down the plan to delay the auctioning of 900 million carbon allowances, in pursuit of a compromise that could green light the controversial attempt to force up the price of carbon. Hopes are mounting that a new package of rules governing how the backloading programme is enacted could help secure sufficient support in the European Parliament for a vote on the plan to pass at the second time of asking. However, a group of liberal MEPs have warned the Commission that time is running out to find a permanent fix for the the bloc’s faltering emissions trading scheme (ETS), which has seen prices crash to an all time low because of a huge surplus of carbon allowances. Nearly 70 MEPs in the Parliament’s Environment Committee will on Wednesday vote to decide exactly what backloading proposals should be put to the plenary next month. The largest parties, the European People’s Party (EPP), Socialists and Democrats and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats (ALDE) have reportedly already agreed a compromise proposal that would include assurances that the witholding of allowances would not be repeated, and that backloading would not lead to the permanent withdrawal of delayed carbon allowances. They will also vote on whether to propose a fund that would take money made from the auctioning of allowances to help energy intensive sectors invest in low carbon technology. The compromises are designed to secure fresh support for the backloading proposals, after a previous bid to push through the plan in April narrowly failed when it was defeated in by 334-315 votes, forcing the plan to return to the committee stage. Chris Davies, British Liberal Democrat MEP and ALDE leader in the Environment Committee, said he was optimistic the backloading would be approved at the second time of asking. “People were very fearful last time round that there would be a huge increase in the carbon price,” he told BusinessGreen . “Even BusinessEurope which opposed backloading last time accept now that any price increase will be unlikely to make a huge difference to competiveness of European industry.” He said the proposed fund for energy intensive industries could be established before 2020 to ensure that low carbon investments can be made swiftly, despite the risk that spending the money before the end of the 2013-2020 Phase III of the ETS could undermine the short-term purpose of backloading by further reducing demand for carbon allowances. But Davies acknowleged that a successful vote this time around could also depend on the Green Party agreeing to the compromises. The Greens have said they could vote against the new proposals, on the grounds that the concessions would stop backloading pushing up the carbon price in any meaningful way. Green MEP Bas Eikhout said the group was unlikely to back the compromise at the preliminary vote by the Environment Committee. “I thought fixing ets was the goal. Now it seems fixing backloading is getting the goal. Less ambition by the day,” he wrote on Twitter last week. But beyond the quick fix that backloading may or may not provide to the carbon price, ALDE MEPs are becoming increasingly concerned that time is running out to deliver more meaningful reforms to the ETS. ALDE MEPs from a range of committees last week wrote to Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, warning that a failure to reform the EU ETS with both long and short term measures would push up the price of tackling climate change for member states. The letter, seen by BusinessGreen , and signed by eight MEPs, including Davies and Fiona Hall, warned that EU’s carbon market cannot be allowed to fail at a time when other countries and regions are looking to set up their own carbon trading schemes. “If the ETS were allowed to fail, EU Member States would still have to deliver on their climate change commitments and would thus be forced to put new mechanisms in place,” adds the letter, which is also signed by Denmark’s Jens Rohde, Germany’s Jurgen Creutzmann, Sweden’s Kent Johansson , France’s Corinne Lepage, Bulgaria’s Vladko Todorov Panayotov, and Romania’s Adina Ioana Valean. “That is why, in parallel with the rapid resolution of the backloading proposal, it is essential to move forward now with structural reform of the ETS and to restore the system’s credibility.” The Commission is due to present structural reform proposals for the ETS this Autumn, which centre on permanently retiring two billion carbon allowances or lowering the emissions cap for companies covered by the ETS in order to increase demand in the market. But the MEPs are concerned that a changeover in the Commission in 2014 will delay progress on the new structural reforms being decided on and implemented until 2015. Davies told BusinessGreen that the letter was designed to push the Commission to start debating long term reforms, despite the run up to next year’s European elections. “In the parliament there seems to be general support for the idea of structural reforms,” he said. But my concern is that when the proposals are put forward, people will find lots of opportunities to disagree with them. We could end up being in the position of a new commission coming in October next year, and it could be 2015 before anything is brought forward and we think that delay [to the wider structural reforms] would be inappropriate.” But alongside these fears, the letter to Hedegaard also suggests that the ALDE group may be closer to building a consensus on the backloading proposals. Panayotov, Valean and Creutzmann all voted against backloading in April, but their signatures on the letter suggest they may now be prepared to support a compromise agreement. Davies, who supported the first backloading vote, said he hoped there would be greater support from ALDE this time round, even though there would still be a split. “It’s not the Environment Committee members we need to win over, it’s the rest of the parliament that voted against backloading last time,” he added. Environment Commitee MEPs will also this week vote on proposals to tighten the EU’s regulation on flourinated gases such as those used in fridges, which have a powerful greenhouse gas effect, and plans to boost the economy through green sustainable industries and ecodesign requirements for water heaters and hot water storage tanks. But despite all these votes all eyes will be on the latest twist in the long-running backloading saga, as both opponents and supporters of the plan wait to see if MEPs can revive the carbon market after all. Continue reading
European Biomass Conference and Exhibition 2013 Press Release
COPENHAGEN: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, MARKET AND POLITICS UNITE FOR EUROPE’S LARGEST GATHERING OF BIOMASS EXPERTS From the 3rd of June 2013 representatives from research, industry, finance and politics from over 60 nations have been gathering in Copenhagen for the 21st European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. This year the event features 270 plenary and oral presentations, more than 460 visual presentation and 80 exhibitors representing once again one of the most important and stimulating international key platforms in Europe and worldwide for knowledge exchange on the latest scientific and industrial results, developments in policies and deployment in the biomass and bioenergy sector. The political opening of the conference provided a clear reminder of Europe’s target of reaching 20% renewable energy by 2020 and the need to achieve this target in an environmentally sustained way. Denmark, the host country, presented their very ambitious target to become totally fossil-free by 2050 with biomass contributing a large proportion to the fossil-free future. In the fight to limit global warming to +2°C the conference was informed of China’s progressive plans for a large expansion of bioenergy to supply its growing energy needs. With many years experience in biofuels production, Brazil reported its plans to push ahead with environmentally sustainable biofuels and bioenergy projects that will no longer rely on economic support from the government. Bioenergy and biofuels are becoming of age. SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE Whether an energy newcomer or specialist, this annual event is seen by international research, governmental, and business communities as Europe’s leading science-to-science, business-to-business and science-to-industry biomass conference and exhibition. As every year the conference programme touches on all the different subjects of the biomass sector during the week. An important number of oral and poster presentations are focused on how to assess and ensure sustainability along biomass value chains, by means of certification, standardization and enacting correct policies. First and foremost, how do we secure a sufficient supply of energy for the future? Do we have sufficient biomass? Can we find the most efficient ways to use the sustainably produced biomass? How can we most efficiently handle and treat our waste – and in particular the biowaste – so that more is recycled and vital nutrients are returned to the soil? How can we develop technologies where we can use biomaterials in new areas, not least those that today are based on oil? These are just some of the questions being addressed this week in Copenhagen by global investors and decision-makers from research, industry, finance and politics. FURTHER INFORMATION: This conference is supported by: European and international organizations such as the European Commission, UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Natural Sciences Sector, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, DEA Danish Energy Agency, WCRE – the World Council for Renewable Energy, EUBIA – the European Biomass Industry Association, Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster, Danish Bioenergy Industries Association, INBIOM Innovation Network Biomass, City of Copenhagen, Wonderful Copenhagen and other organizations. Free download of high quality photos Press contact: Chiara Benetti, Tel. +39-055-5002174; Email: chiara.benetti@etaflorence.it Continue reading