Tag Archives: countries

Eastern Europe Beckons Farmland Investors

Adam Oliver Suzie Horne Sunday 21 April 2013 http://www.fwi.co.uk…?itemid=5242986 As investor interest in farmland increases across Central and Eastern Europe,  Adam Oliver  of Brown & Co reviews the market. Land prices are firming across much of Central and Eastern Europe, as interest from institutional investors begins to translate into transactions on the ground. This is mainly through pension funds from the USA and Canada, as well as from some European countries such as the Netherlands and Denmark. These have spent a good while researching and assessing their opportunities and are now acting. As land ownership becomes increasingly compelling and more difficult to realise in many other countries around the world, the trend looks set to continue. While new farmer investment has dried to a trickle in recent years, those who invested in the region in the early and mid 1990s have been through some very tough years and are now seeing capital growth and improved farming results. Although there are significant variations in growth rates, the Central and Eastern European land market has by no means topped out. Farmers looking in this direction to expand can find the land they need and invest, with an exit strategy based on the expectation of further capital growth. Poland Land values in Poland have continued to mature since EU accession in 2004 and are still firming, particularly for good-quality land. Prices range from £1,200/acre up to £4,800/acre at the top end. For top-quality land this represents an increase of about 25% compared with three years ago. As with other member states, EU accession in 2004 helped the agricultural sector in Poland. It received grants for machinery and buildings, and single farm payments were introduced, which last year amounted to about £170/ha. Romania Romania’s land market is also gaining. It is divided into two distinct markets – very small parcels of land that are not consolidated and similar parcels that are merged into large workable blocks. Consolidation is the process whereby very small parcels of land owned by many small landholders are amalgamated, sometimes by purchase and sometimes by swapping, to achieve workable blocks that are 100% in the same ownership. Where 100% is not possible, a small proportion is rented. Unconsolidated blocks on the primary market range from £600/acre while consolidated workable blocks of land normally change hands at £1,000-1,800/acre. This is about 5-10% higher than a year ago and there is definitely increased interest in the Romanian land market compared with 2011 and 2012. Ukraine There is a moratorium on all agricultural land sales in Ukraine. This means it is not possible to own land in Ukraine, but long-term lease rights are available. The value of these rights has firmed in the past six months, ranging from £75/acre to £300/acre for typical 10-20 year agreements, on top of which an annual rent of perhaps £20/acre is paid. This typically represents a 10-20% rise from 2012, but in many cases is still only 50% of the market highs that were being paid in 2008 before the global financial crisis. The moratorium has been scheduled for review in the past but has so far not resulted in a change in the legislation. While it is likely to be revisited in the future, there are no guarantees or timelines for when this may take place although lease agreements carry the right of pre-emption to purchase the land whenever the legislation is changed. Russia Russia’s land market remains relatively stable, with registered freehold farms that have reasonable infrastructure changing hands at £125-300/acre. Values remain largely similar to 2011 and 2012, with considerable supply dampening the market, but there is evidence of premiums now being paid for land with irrigation potential. The announcement of up to 50% grant support under the federal government’s latest agricultural development plan has improved the prospects for such land. The grants cover both renovation of existing infrastructure and new irrigation projects. Over the past 12 months Brown & Co has completed several acquisitions and has others ongoing in Romania, Poland and Ukraine, both for institutional clients and family interests. The recent sale of Continental Farmers Group (CFG), which farms about 30,000ha in Ukraine and Poland, to a consortium from Dubai is an example of the growing interest in the region. This interest has several drivers apart from wider factors such as population growth and the changing economic status and demands of consumers in countries such as China. For investors from the Middle East the main drivers seem to be food security-related issues while land ownership, operating returns and potential land appreciation are important factors for other investors. The countries in the world where land ownership is possible and where title is at least reasonably secure appear to be diminishing. The increasing desire of some countries to retain precious resources such as productive agricultural land, minerals and water – often referred to as resource nationalism – is likely to make the CEE region more compelling for investors. Crop yields are relatively modest by Western European standards, but so are costs. Across the region, wheat yields range from 3.5t to 8t/ha, with an average around 5t/ha with the highest yields generally in Poland and the lowest in Russia. Added to that, the opportunity to manage land very well and translate improved yields and operating returns into enterprise value and/or an increase in the value of the land seems to be driving a number of investors. We would generally recommend purchasing land over renting it (Ukraine excepted), but this does depend on the specific circumstances. A land amalgamation strategy in Romania would be centred on land appreciation, whereas acquiring 5,000-10,000ha of leasehold in Ukraine is all about operating returns with the potential (or option) to eventually buy out the freehold in the future if there is a change in legislation. For an investor seeking relative security we would recommend a diversified portfolio of land ownership across Poland and Romania. This could range from 200ha to 10,000ha. For very large-scale investors, Ukraine and Russia are really the only places that suit, offering the opportunity to farm 20,000ha, 30,000ha or even up to 100,000ha-plus. While risk levels are highest in Russia and Ukraine, the results in the long term could be very interesting if quality management is put in place early on. What’s available – examples 200ha of freehold good-quality arable land in southern Poland – guide price of £1m plus cost of machinery/work in progress 3,000ha of freehold of good-quality land in southern Romania – guide price of £9m plus cost of machinery/work in progress 1,200ha in southern Ukraine, 10 year leasehold – guide price of £600,000 plus cost of machinery/ equipment, work in progress 20,000ha in southern Russia – ringfenced, registered leasehold with 37 years remaining – guide price £10m Around the region Poland Most developed market with land price firming, helped by EU accession Prices range from £1,200/acre up to £4,800/acre Top-quality land price has risen about 25% in past three years Single farm payments were worth about £69/acre last year Romania Land market gaining compared with 2012 – up about 5-10% on a year ago Values split between lower priced very small parcels of land priced from £600/acre to large workable blocks at £1,000-1,800/acre Ukraine No agricultural land sales permitted but long-term lease rights are possible. Value of rights has firmed in the past six months and ranges from £75/acre to £300/acre for typical 10 year agreements Annual rent of c £20/acre also payable Prices have risen 10-20% on a year ago but mostly still only 50% of highs paid in 2008 before global financial crisis. Russia Relatively stable market but well supplied Land with registered freehold and reasonable infrastructure selling at £125-300/acre Values remain largely similar to 2011 and 2012 Some premiums being paid for land with irrigation potential Federal government has published 50% grant support mechanisms under its latest Agricultural Development Plan. Adam Oliver is a partner at Brown & Co, responsible for Central and Eastern Europe Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Dubai, Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Eastern Europe Beckons Farmland Investors

Latin America Clean Energy Investments Surged 127% Higher In 2012

April 30, 2013 Some $4.6 billion of clean energy investments were made in Latin America (excluding Brazil) in 2012, a whopping 127% increase from 2011, according to figures released in advance of the third annual Renewable Energy Finance Forum – Latin America & Caribbean (REFF-LAC), which is being held in Miami this week. In sharp contrast to the strong gain in Latin America clean energy investments, new clean energy investments fell 11% year over year globally, from $302.32 billion in 2011 to $268.69 billion, according to the latest report from Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF). The global decrease was the first fall in renewable energy financing recorded by BNEF since it began collecting data. Latin America: A Clean Energy Investment Bright Spot In 2012 Latin America was a bright spot amid an overall decline in global renewable energy financing in 2012. Four countries experienced triple-digit clean energy investment growth: Mexico’s total new financial investments in clean energy for 2012 reached $1.9 billion, up 595% year over year; New financial investments in clean energy totaled $1 billion, up 313% from $246 million in 2011; Uruguay’s total new investments in clean energy reached $105 million, a 285% year-over-year increase; Total clean energy investments in Peru reached $643 million, a 176% increase from $233 million in 2011. By dollar amount, Brazil actually led the Latin America & Caribbean region when it came to total clean energy investments. Some $5.17 billion of capital was invested in clean energy in South America’s largest nation in 2012, according to BNEF. Mexico ($1.998 billion) and Chile ($1.018 billion) ranked second and third, respectively. Turning to 2012, LatAm-Caribbean investments in clean energy sectors, biomass and waste attracted the most capital ($822.34 million), biofuels followed ($539.47 million), and geothermal ranked third ($76.69 million), BNEF found. “The increased investments in non-Brazil Latin America was driven by increased activity by the Inter-American Development Bank,” Maria Gabriela da Rocha Oliveira, BNEF’s head of Latin America Research and Analysis, was quoted in a press release. “Additionally, European players, both project developers and manufacturers, have become more active in the region given grim conditions at home.” Added Carlos St. James, president of the Latin American & Caribbean Council on Renewable Energy (LAC-CORE) and CEO of VOLA Investments LLC: “As investments in clean energy declined in 2012 due to the ongoing financial crisis, the sector was actually growing in most of Latin America. This is a huge boon for clean energy finance and the region, which we expect to continue to grow. The most exciting trend is that this has moved beyond Brazil, with other countries now seeing amazing growth and potential.” Read more at http://cleantechnica…8VV0xjeBROwJ.99 Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Latin America Clean Energy Investments Surged 127% Higher In 2012

A Paradigm Shift in EU Climate Policy

By 3p Contributor | May 1st, 2013 By Emil Dimantchev On 16 April, the European Parliament rejected a proposal to reduce supply in the European emissions trading system (EU ETS). The European carbon price crashed to never-before-seen lows immediately afterwards, reflecting just how important the Parliament’s vote was. The outcome prompted The Economist to title its response article, “ ETS RIP? ” Thomson Reuters Point Carbon declared the EU ETS “irrelevant as an emissions reduction tool for many years to come.” Given the historic importance ascribed to the vote, it is important to consider how it came about and what implications it has for carbon markets in Europe and around the world. Since 2009, the EU ETS has accumulated a large surplus of allowances, as emissions have fallen faster than initially predicted by the system’s creators. There are two main reasons for the drop in emissions – Europe’s financial crisis and its policies for promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency. The market’s surplus has caused carbon prices to decline dramatically from their peak of €29 per ton in 2008 to €5 per ton just prior to the 16 April vote. Low carbon prices were, by themselves, not considered a problem for the EU ETS. They reflected the fact that EU’s short-term commitment to reduce emissions had become easier to meet. The EU no longer needed to switch from coal to gas or adopt Carbon Capture and Storage to reduce emissions by 20 percent below 1990 levels in 2020, and so it no longer needed a high carbon price. In the context of European climate policy however, low carbon prices worried policymakers. The EU does not have a legally binding emission reduction target for 2030, or 2040. Therefore, in the absence of a significant carbon price, the private sector lacks a clear policy signal to invest in low carbon technologies. The European Commission, the executive arm of the EU, recognized this as a problem for climate policy in the long term. The energy sector’s long investment cycles mean that high-carbon capacity built today would eventually make it harder to meet EU’s 2050 emission target – to reduce emissions by 90 percent below 1990. To restore the signal for low carbon investments, the Commission came up with a complicated two-step plan to increase carbon prices. The first step was a proposal to adjust the timing of supply in the market – withdrawing permits in the next few years and re-injecting them later (referred to as backloading). The second step would be a more fundamental amendment to the carbon market, which would allow the permanent cancellation of permits. Analysts agreed that these two measures would significantly increase prices. Participants in the market expected the plan to go through and make carbon prices significant for business decisions. A survey by Thomson Reuters Point Carbon in February revealed 65 percent of market participants believed there would be a backloading of permits and 64 percent believed permits would be cancelled. But on 16 April, the European Parliament rejected the Commission’s backloading proposal, effectively putting an end to the bureaucrats’ two-step plan. The failure of the proposal combined with the upcoming elections of a new Commission and Parliament in 2014 means there is likely no time to table new proposals by 2015 or implement any supply adjusting measures before 2020. The market is therefore likely to stay oversupplied for the rest of the decade. Thomson Reuters Point Carbon believes prices will not rise significantly above €3 per ton, where they are currently, before 2020. A long period of low carbon prices marks a paradigm shift for European climate policy. Before the Commission’s backloading proposal was shot down, businesses expected European carbon prices to remain significant in the long term. These expectations drove emission reductions – several studies showed that companies reduced 330 million tons of emissions because of the ETS between 2005 and 2010, despite an excess of supply and volatile prices. But expectations for low prices in the long term will most likely render the ETS insignificant for business decisions. In terms of its capacity to create incentives for low-carbon investments, the EU ETS is entering an ice age. The demise of Europe’s carbon prices affects not only European climate policy, but will most likely reverberate to carbon markets elsewhere. The European experience is unlikely to reverse progress made on emerging carbon markets in California, Australia, China, South Korea and other countries. On the contrary, it will probably make them more resilient. The history of the EU ETS teaches that the absence of price floors in an emissions trading system fails to deliver the clear, predictable and long-term incentive, which the energy sector requires for investments in carbon-free technologies. A carbon price floor will, theoretically, amend what many consider the systemic drawback of the EU ETS. A price floor can be implemented through a price containment reserve which takes permits out of the system when prices become too low. California’s ETS adopts a similar approach. In the future, it might provide a proof of concept for incorporating the same principle in other carbon markets. Considering the recent developments in Europe, price management mechanisms could well become a model to follow for carbon markets around the world. Emil Dimantchev is a carbon market analyst at Thomson Reuters Point Carbon. The views expressed in this article are entirely his own, unless stated otherwise. Image credit: Thomson Reuters Point Carbon Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Paradigm Shift in EU Climate Policy