Tag Archives: climate
Revealed: The Keys To Reducing The Impact Of Agriculture On Climate Change
Research published in the journal Science (5th July 2013) shows that allowing land use to be determined purely by agricultural markets results in considerable financial and environmental costs to the public. While the research has looked specifically at the UK, the same methods could be applied to any area of the world with similar results for many countries. Land use in most of Europe is dominated by agriculture. Nearly half the total annual value of EU agriculture is based on public financial support surpassing 70%, 40% and 30% in the case of Ireland, UK and Spain, respectively to name a few. The study demonstrates the importance of bringing ecosystem services into decision-making and to make full use of the potential gains from working with the natural environment and the underpinning biophysical processes. The study acknowledges that this does not come without practical challenges. A key challenge concerns the mechanics of securing the participation of farmers in delivering land-use changes to benefit society. A recommendation that the research team puts forward involves the reform of the European Union’s (EU’s) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Recasting the CAP as a Payment for Ecosystem Services mechanism would reward farmers for delivering a bundle of key of ecosystem services including climate change mitigation by the reduction of emission of greenhouse gases, water regulation, recreation and biodiversity conservation. “The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy must account for the cost of not working with nature. It is time to reward farmers for securing the vital ecosystem services that are highly valued by society. Farmers can be the stewards of our landscapes so that we as a society we can pass them in a healthy state to the next generations.” Continue reading
Can Cutting Trees Curb Emissions And Improve Incomes In Mexico?
Source: Thomson Reuters Foundation – Wed, 24 Jul 2013 A member of the Mayan indigenous community of San Antonio Tuk climbs a gum tree with a machete in hand to score its bark for extraction of the resin that gives Mexican chewing gum its name: chicle. THOMSON REUTERS FOUNDATION/Talli Nauman SAN ANTONIO TUK, Mexico (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – Not far from the site of the Cancun 2010 U.N. climate change summit, indigenous people in rural southeast Mexico are doing their part to staunch global warming. They are perfecting Community Forestry Enterprises (CFEs) to establish long-term profitability through tree farming and related agricultural practices that protect the environment. “Climate change is a serious problem in the world, caused by bad habits,” says Miguel Cante Chuc, president of the Ya’ax Sot Ot’ Yook’Ol Kaab Environmental Service-Providers Network. “We as Mayan people want to be sure it is reversed.” The 9-year-old network consists of 12 Mayan jungle villages in the state of Quintana Roo on the Yucatan Peninsula, with the specific objective “to mitigate climate change and obtain financial resources.” For all their good intentions, however, a big obstacle to success – one that they face together with hundreds of other communities like theirs across the country – is lack of access to loans for logging equipment and operations. To ease that problem, Mexico’s government has created a Forest Investment Plan that will extend cut-rate credit lines from foreign lenders to support Community Forestry Enterprises . The plan allows the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) to administer a novel $6 million, 5-year technical assistance and micro-loan pilot project for local forest production projects. Now in the design phase, Mexico’s trend-setting small-business loan assistance pilot aims to boost timber industry profits, foster community socio-economic stability, and ease problems associated with climate change. Bank representatives hope the endeavor will be an example to the country and the world. “It’s an innovative project offering the possibility to have something new and successful that’s never been done before,” says IDB Senior Climate Change Specialist Gloria Visconti. It promises at least 60 CFEs will average a 6-percent increase in annual profits, garnering higher income for the 4,900 people involved in them, and providing indirect benefits to 10,680 community members. At the same time, it is expected to result in the capture of the equivalent of 28,610 tons of carbon. WHY MATCH TREE FARMERS WITH BANKERS? To understand why something like this was never done before and how it will work, it’s vital to consider Mexico’s peculiar land-tenure legacy. After the hacienda system provoked peasant rebellion in the Mexican Revolution, the ensuing Constitution of 1917 provided safeguards against plantation exploitation by advancing one of the largest systems of communal land tenure in the world. Land reform defined common property holdings for comunidades (traditional indigenous ancestral territories) and ejidos (parcels distributed to dispossessed peasants). In each of these units, community members elect officials and hold general assemblies to vote on land-use questions. Today, communal landholders control the rights to a whopping 60 percent of Mexico’s forest lands, according to independent Mexican CFE specialist David Bray. Some 13 million people live off these lands, about half of whom belong to the country’s 62 indigenous groups, according to the IDB. Extensive research by Bray and other scientists has established that the local governance of many of Mexico’s forests has made community forestry undertakings more successful than either corporate concessions or protected areas in conserving natural resources, providing employment, and ensuring environmental services that combat global warming. The combination of legal rights, traditional knowledge, and economic self-interest in Mexico’s community forestry model has made it a beacon for other countries seeking to stem poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas proliferation. Timber production in comunidades and ejidos generally is a community-wide endeavor. Alternatively, smaller groups form inside these communities to extract and market timber. They are now learning that their natural resources could afford significantly more economic dividends to their mostly low-income residents, while helping compensate for industrialised countries’ failure to adhere to mandatory international commitments to reduce carbon emissions. “Through a program of carbon capture, we can provide economic sustenance to our families, live in the jungle, use it, and produce more environmental services,” Cante Chuc says. Looking over his shoulder he can see one of the 159 members of the Mayan indigenous community of San Antonio Tuk climbing a gum tree with a machete in hand to score its bark for extraction of the resin that gives Mexican chewing gum the name chicle . The work of the chicleros , who harvest and make gum, complements softwood lumbering and a protected area set-aside in San Antonio Tuk’s diversification and management plan for a robust woodlot and for greenhouse gas reductions. Tapping the gum tree and processing the product provides income to relieve economic pressure to fell precious and endangered tropical hardwoods like mahogany. BREAKING WITH ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ The principle climate changing greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, is absorbed by healthy jungles and forests, partially offsetting emissions released by burning fossil-fuels elsewhere. Contrary to popular belief, managed cutting of forest for timber can actually increase the carbon-absorbing capacity of the trees, because lumber products store the carbon absorbed from the atmosphere (as long as they are not burned), and new growth replaces felled trees, Bray notes. Yet the efforts of communal landholders have rarely been met with offers of credit, partly because the ejidos and comunidades by definition hold their properties in trusts that have not been considered equity or collateral. What’s more, Visconti notes, “Asking for credit is a cultural issue.” CFE operators “need consultation so they can be involved and ready to receive credit,” she says. The IDB project, called Support for Forest Related Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Ejidos and Communities, proposes to bring the lenders and the borrowers to the same table to resolve these issues. Since neither the CFEs nor the banks have a history of loans for lumber business development, $4.2 million of the project disbursement will go just to technical assistance and $1.8 million will go to loans. “It’s an innovative project,” Visconti says. “It’s not business as usual. If it was, it wouldn’t be part of the Climate Investment Funds,” she adds. The Climate Investment Funds (CIF) were established in 2008 to provide scaled-up climate financing to developing countries, with the aim of creating new climate resilient, low-carbon development models. CIF funds are channeled through five multilateral development banks, including the IDB. Though the Forest Investment Program , one part of the CIF, the Inter-American Development Bank is supporting Mexico’s Forest Investment Plan, including the pilot forestry project in Mexico, and similar projects in Peru and Brazil. The Forest Investment Program aims to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, promote sustainable management of forests and enhance forest carbon stocks. Mexico’s project “is expected to develop models for future global replication,” the approved proposal for IDB administration states. FIRST PRIVATE-SECTOR LOANS It is the first time that the bank’s Multilateral Investment Fund will work with the private sector in a project of this type, it notes, “and the lessons learned from its implementation will be important contributions to the national policy for the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries ( REDD++ ) program currently being developed.” Findeca, a private lender that has experience financing shade-grown sustainable coffee plantations in southern Mexico, has signed on to the project. It will be in charge of delivering the Multilateral Investment Fund money to the landholders. It will kick in loans only after the non-profit Mexican Fund for the Conservation of Nature (FMCN) has rounded up the technical assistance and consultants to build community acceptance and capacity to use and repay loans. “We’re still in negotiations for the project,” said FMCN spokesman Juan Manuel Frausto. He expects a final contract with IDB in September, after which the first step will be to identify an initial batch of communities to take part. The project will focus first on five of the eight states with the highest net forest loss — Oaxaca, Yucatán, Quintana Roo, Campeche and Jalisco. These states have 1,768 forestry communities with a total population of more than 500,000, average poverty rates of 75 percent and a 40 percent indigenous makeup. The limited experience with private sector investment in Community Forestry Enterprises in Mexico requires the “demonstration approach” being taken in this project. The money will not start to flow until 2014, Visconti says. Loans will be in the range of $800 to $3,000. The CFEs could use the micro credits to buy equipment such as tractors or inputs such as seeds “to facilitate efficient production and to make them more sustainable,” Visconti says. The small amounts are viable for all but the largest and most sophisticated CFEs, Bray says. “There are many forestry communities in Mexico who need additional support to improve their logging or to move into logging,” Bray says. “Community forestry is a very mature sector with lots of successes, and there are a lot of opportunities in communities that are struggling with lack of support,” he adds. Talli Nauman is co-director of the consulting firm Journalism to Raise Environmental Awareness, based in Aguascalientes, Mexico. This article is part of a series funded by the Climate Investment Funds . Continue reading
Xinhua Insight: Carbon Emissions Trading Gains Momentum In China, Despite Challenges
Xinhua Insight: Carbon emissions trading gains momentum in China, despite challenges by Xinhua Writers Wang Wen and Yan Qilei GUIYANG, July 21 (Xinhua) – Chinese government officials, environment and energy experts, and entrepreneurs have vowed to join hands in accelerating the process of building a nationwide carbon emissions trading market. “The country will soon carry out scientific methods to record enterprises’ carbon emissions in major industries and find ways to allocate emissions quota appropriately, as preparations for a nationwide carbon emissions trading market,” said Su Wei, director of the climate change department of the National Development and Reform Commission. Su said at an ongoing international environmental protection forum held in Guiyang, capital of southwest China’s Guizhou Province, that as pilot carbon emissions trading schemes will be launched successively in seven provinces and cities in 2013 and 2014, the country is gaining momentum in curbing greenhouse gas emissions with a market mechanism. Experts and industry leaders, on the other hand, have warned of potential difficulties in terms of the legislature, carbon financing, statistics gathering and quota allocation, monitoring and assessment systems — all of which are key to building a mature market. “Carbon emissions trading will remain a fake market until these problems are solved,” said Xiong Yan, head of the Chinese state-owned Property Exchanges Association. PILOT SCHEME PROGRESS One month prior to the forum, China launched its first regional market for compulsory carbon trading in the southern city of Shenzhen after more than two years of preparations. The scheme covers 635 industrial companies and some public buildings that account for about 40 percent of the city’s carbon emissions. The carbon intensity, or the amount of carbon produced per unit of gross domestic product, of the 635 industrial companies in 2015 will drop 32 percent from the levels in 2010. Under the trading program, those that emit below their quotas could sell their excess limits to other emitters and even investors for profit. Eight deals, or 21,112-tonne carbon quotas, were traded on the first day at prices ranging from 28 to 32 yuan (about 4.6 to 5.2 U.S. dollars) per tonne. Following Shenzhen, six other areas — Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Hubei and Guangdong — will launch the scheme soon. “These areas were carefully chosen, because they vary in levels of economic development, industrial structure as well as residents’ environmental protection awareness,” said Su, who added that the experience gained can be applied to the whole country. “Shenzhen, which is already a harbor for high-tech and environmentally-friendly enterprises, will further raise the market entry threshold and reject energy-consuming and high-polluting companies. But for the less-developed western city of Chongqing, the government has to persuade heavy industries to balance profit growth and environmental protection,” said Su. Qi Shaozhou, a professor at Wuhan Univerisity, said the emissions trading scheme in Hubei will set an example for parts of central and western of China on how to lift people out of poverty while still curbing pollution. It will also help the regional government, local enterprises and environmental protection organizations come to a consensus on eco-development plans. Experts on the forum also applauded how the public has changed its concept of carbon trading. “Five years ago when the China-Beijing Environmental Exchange was launched, officials would prevaricate, and enterprises and the general public said they did not understand the reason why such an exchange should be established,” said Xiong Yan. “But things are totally different now.” Chery Auto has invested 20 million yuan in the water supply network and rainwater collection system in its plant in Guiyang, reducing sewage disposal, said a manager surnamed Wang at Chery’s subsidy in Guiyang. She said more companies in western regions, including those in the steel, cement and chemical industries, value corporate social responsibility greatly and are willing to participate in carbon emissions trading. CHALLENGES FOR NATIONWIDE MARKET While they hailed the pilot schemes as a landmark step for China in building a nationwide market, experts said fundamental problems should be resolved before a market mechanism for curbing greenhouse gas emissions can be called a success in the country. “We want a law on carbon emissions trading and low-carbon development as soon as possible,” said Li Junfeng, head of China’s National Climate Change Strategy Research and International Cooperation Center. He said administrative means have limited influence in raising people’s awareness. With a legal bounding, companies will learn their rights and duties more clearly. “A law on climate change will enable government departments and public sectors to have a clear-cut division of work on the issue,” said Wang Yi, deputy director-general of the Institute of Policy and Management with the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Apart from legislature, Wang and his fellow experts appealed for the government to determine China’s total allowed carbon emissions. The country has pledged to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 40 to 45 percent per unit of GDP by 2020, compared with the levels in 2005. “Without setting a figure for the intensity cut, or a date by which China’s total emissions would start falling, we cannot allocate quotas scientifically,” said Wang, who added that only when carbon emissions quotas become a scarce resource will companies be willing to trade for it. However, Wang also admitted that setting a figure for a developing country that still relies heavily on energy-consuming, high-polluting industries for economic development and poverty relief, determining a figure is not as easy as it seems. Pilot carbon emissions markets currently allocate quotas to enterprises according to their historical carbon emissions. “How to monitor companies’ carbon emissions and which organization can we appeal to when we are unfairly treated in emissions trading or quota transfers, are all to be decided,” said Huang Yaping, vice board chairman of Huaneng Coking Gas Co., Ltd. “It seems unfair that companies that emitted less pollution historically could receive stricter requirements. But we have to consider whether those that polluted more can afford substantial emissions reductions in a short period of time,” said Su, adding that reducing emissions is a long-term task for these enterprises. How to introduce carbon finance, or the creation of financial instruments that are tradable on the carbon market, is another important issue, said Li Junfeng. He said the government should be cautious not to let speculative investment result in negative price spikes while still introducing financial instruments to the market. Continue reading