Tag Archives: chat
USDA FSA Solicits Bids For Feedstock Flexibility Program
By Erin Voegele | August 20, 2013 USDA Surplus sugar is one step closer to entering the U.S. biofuels industry as feedstock. The USDA Farm Service Agency recently published a notice soliciting bids under the Feedstock Flexibility Program for Bioenergy Producers. The program encourages domestic production of biofuels from surplus sugar. Information published by the USDA explains that the program was created by Congress in the 2008 Farm Bill. It essentially requires the USDA to purchase sugar and sell it as feedstock to bioenergy producers in order to avoid forfeiture of sugar pledged as collateral by processors when securing nonrecourse community loans from the Commodity Credit Corp. The USDA further explains that federal law allows sugar producers to obtain loans from the CCC with maturities of up to nine months at the beginning of the crop year. When the loan matures, the sugar processor may repay the loan or forfeit the sugar used as collateral. According to the USDA, the last time forfeitures occurred was in 2004, but atypical market conditions have caused it to take action this year to avoid forfeitures. Within the announcement , the USDA FSA specifies that any sugar purchased by the CCC under the Feedstock Flexibility Program will be sold on a competitive basis to bioenergy producers. That sugar must be used to produce biofuel. A fact sheet published by the USDA FSA in August specifies that bioenergy producers buying sugar under the program must take possession of the sugar no more than 30 days from the date of the CCC’s purchase. According to the notice, quantify offers are due by 1:30 p.m. CT on Aug. 21. By 6:30 p.m. that same day, a catalog listing with all offered quantities will be available on the FSA website here . Price offers will be due on Aug. 28, and the CCC will notify those with successful offers the following day. Additional information on the Feedstock Flexibility Program final rule, which was published in July, is available here . Continue reading
EM Storms Could Spread To Europe
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/03acf9f0-098b-11e3-8b32-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2cXAczb6b By Ralph Atkins in London Periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for sell-off At the start of this year, emerging market turmoil was on few investors’ worry lists. Top preoccupations were US fiscal woes, the rumbling eurozone debt crisis and a possible “hard” landing for China’s economy. Nobody really considered what would happen if all those threats did not materialise. The financial storms hitting India and other developing economies this week are the answer. With the US economy having successfully avoided possible global upsets and growing steadily, the US Federal Reserve wants to wind down its asset purchases, or “quantitative easing”, from as early as next month. As a result bond prices have fallen, and yields risen correspondingly, in developed markets – and the strong flows of capital into emerging markets that had been attracted by higher yields there have gone firmly into reverse. Worst hit have been countries most reliant on capital inflows – those with gaping current account deficits to finance. In India, where the deficit exceeded 5 per cent of gross domestic product last year, the rupee has tumbled to a record low against the dollar. Equity prices have fallen precipitously, while 10-year bond yields have approached 10 per cent, the highest for five years. The good news is that this has not yet spun into a full-blown emerging market crisis, and the Fed can control the pace at which it “tapers” asset purchases. European shares are benefiting as an alternative contrarian trade for investors looking for underrated assets. The bad news is that we are still at the start of the process of exiting global QE and the effects will spread – including, perhaps, to weaker European economies. Much of what is happening in emerging markets is the result of national factors – India’s troubles have been exacerbated by seemingly cack-handed political decisions. It is also true that global investors fell out of love with emerging market equities long before Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman, first hinted at tapering on May 22. Thus the extent to which tapering is causing the emerging market tensions is disputed. But it seems obvious that tapering talk has at least exacerbated the sell-off. Outflows from Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) bond funds have been equivalent to almost a third of assets under management since May 22, according to EPFR, a funds data provider. That compares with just 4 per cent from the start of the year until Mr Bernanke spoke. Moreover, there has been a clear relationship between the size of current account deficits and the extent to which countries have been hit by the financial turmoil – strengthening the argument that it is reversed QE flows that are the main culprit. Indonesia, where the current account also deteriorated sharply last year, has seen some of the sharpest equity price falls. South Africa, Turkey and Brazil have, like India, seen steep rises in bond yields and tumbling dollar exchange rates. Ominously, the lesson of economic history is that when capital inflows go into reverse, the turnround is often abrupt and painful. Nor are surplus countries immune. When emerging market fund managers have to finance sudden large outflows they are forced to sell higher-quality, more liquid assets – and the effects spread. For Europeans, this week’s events are eerily reminiscent of the damage wreaked on the Baltic states that were running massive current account deficits when the global financial crisis erupted in 2007. Eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. For a while, weaker members of the eurozone were protected by the currency union. But then the eurozone itself was almost torn apart as strong capital flows from the continent’s north to the southern periphery went into reverse. Fixed exchange rate regimes sometimes lull investors into a false sense of security by delaying an inevitable correction. This week’s emerging market turmoil will encourage the shift in investor sentiment back towards developed economies, especially those returning to internally driven, self-sustaining growth. The risk for Europe, however, is that periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for a sell-off. If German 10-year Bund yields are rising – they have this week exceeded 1.9 per cent, compared with less than 1.2 per cent in early May – yields below 4.5 per cent on Italian and Spanish equivalents look less compelling. For now, eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. But we are at the start of a long process in which US monetary policy will evolve – with effects nobody can predict with confidence. Continue reading
Analysis – Lower Crop Prices A Pain For Deere, But Farmers Are Fine
http://s1.reutersmed…r=CBRE97E0YUC00 By James B. Kelleher CHICAGO | Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:32pm BST (Reuters) – Wall Street’s frosty reaction on Wednesday to Deere & Co’s ( DE.N ) latest quarterly earnings is no surprise given the recent sharp drop in agricultural commodity prices. Farmers buy fewer tractors and harvesters when corn and soybean prices are down. But the dramatic drops in corn and other prices over the past year are not causing a lot of pain on the farms. At least not yet. With income at records highs, farmland fetching top dollar and balance sheets strong, a drop in grain prices in the face of another record crop is hardly a sign of doom for growers. Lower prices are generating a lot of uncertainty around Deere, however. For the world’s largest maker of tractors and harvesters, as goes the price of corn, so too goes the price of the company’s shares. Deere prefers to talk about the correlation between farm cash receipts and the sales of its distinctive green and yellow equipment. And it is true that the two move up and down in tandem. But the correlation between its stock price and the price of corn on the Chicago Board of Trade is pretty high, too. That is why the last few years have been so good to Deere: Both corn prices and farm income were on a tear. For decades, corn prices hovered between $2 (£1.29) and $3 (£1.93) a bushel, but they surged as high as $8.49 a bushel during last summer’s drought. Supplies were tight, even as demand from China and other emerging markets increased along with rising corn-based ethanol use in the United States. Net farm income has doubled over the past five years, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service. Surging corn prices and rising production have been big factors. Farm balance sheets are strong, too. Net farm assets have risen by nearly $700 billion since 2009, according to the USDA, while net debt has gone up by just $40 billion. That is why the last few years have been so good to the top and bottom lines at Deere and its rivals in the farm equipment space, including Agco Corp ( AGCO.N ) and CNH Global NV CNH.N. Between 2009 and 2012, Deere’s farm machinery sales grew 60 percent and its diluted earnings per share jumped 270 percent. Deere continues to benefit from flush farmers. In the results released on Wednesday, Deere said its profit jumped nearly 30 percent, even though sales were only up 4 percent. The company, in a nutshell, was able to sock it to farmers price wise. But the company’s shares, which have underperformed the broader market all year long, fell as much as 3 percent following Wednesday’s report. The disconnect is all about expectations. The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Monday forecast a record corn harvest in 2013, which pushed the price down to $4.55 a bushel, near a three-year low. Now farmers – notoriously conservative – are widely expected to cut back on spending for equipment and acreage, which have also spiked in recent years. No one is expecting a catastrophic decline in the purchase of tractors, combines and other farm implements. Deere believes farmers’ cash receipts will fall 4 percent next year after a sharper 8 percent decline this year. Why would a 50 percent drop in corn prices result in a much more modest hit for farmers? Well, cash receipts are a function of both quantity and price. Corn was a lot more expensive last year, but the drought cut into yields. What’s more, farm income can include all kinds of non-crop revenue such as government payments, and crop and revenue insurance. Farmers also have lots of storage capacity, so they do not have to sell at current prices. They can store their grain instead. Add it up. Lower expected farm receipts + lower corn prices = double trouble for Deere shareholders. That is why many analysts who cover Deere, including Adam Fleck at Morningstar, expect the next few years to be tough for the company. “We’re a far cry from the farm crisis of the 1970s and 1980s,” said Fleck. “But the cold hard fact is farmers can always run a tractor one more year.” Lower corn and soybean prices, combined with the possibility of lower farmland values and higher interest rates, are coming together in a bad way for equipment manufacturers already facing several years of really difficult comparisons. Unlike farmers, Deere does not have a bin where it can store unsold farm equipment. It can’t stockpile tractors and combines and wait for the farmers to return. Deere, and perhaps its stockholders, might just have to tough this one out. (Additional reporting by Gavin Maguire.; Editing by David Greising and Andre Grenon) Continue reading