Tag Archives: carbon
EU Carbon Defies Logic as UN Talks Stall, Climate Mundial Says
By Mathew Carr – Jun 17, 2013 Daniel Rossetto, managing director of Climate Mundial Ltd., comments on the European Union carbon market, plans known as backloading to delay supply temporarily and United Nations-overseen climate talks in Bonn that ended June 14. He spoke today and June 14 by e-mail. On EU carbon prices, which fell 4.2 percent today to 4.57 euros ($6.10) a metric ton after rising 16 percent last week: “EU carbon continues to defy logic, providing a price signal based on a belief that there will be long-term carbon cuts through 2030 and beyond that have yet to be agreed. There is no other way to explain why the commodity has any price whatsoever when there is no scarcity today and backloading only deals with half of the glut.” On UN envoys’ plans to negotiate changes to decision-making rules at climate talks: “I am far less concerned about this procedural issue than I am about the process for getting commitments within each country that would bind them to the negotiated outcomes in 2015. As we have seen in the case of Canada , it is very easy for a country to withdraw from the treaty without consequence. Given we are already at 2013, each country should by now have started the process of seeking a domestic mandate for what they can agree to in 2015 at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change for post-2020. I don’t see much evidence of this going on, so it makes me very worried that we will get to 2015 and we will not be any closer to having a legally binding agreement.” On a proposal to change the decision-making threshold at climate talks to 75 percent of nations voting from consensus: “The threshold of 100 percent is unworkable. Giving the chair discretion is also too open to personal opinion. A lower threshold of 75 percent would be much better and allow decisions to be made. Financial penalties are also essential to ensure countries have the greatest possible incentive to comply in every way with the provisions of the eventual agreement. A best-endeavors basis is not enough.” On penalties under climate agreements: “The penalties can be paid into the Global Environment Facility and distributed to abatement and adaptation projects in the poorest countries. Each country should also have its own domestic law, not just ratification of the treaty, mandating its commitments under the UNFCCC.” Those domestic laws would make the UN agreement “fully legally enforceable.” To contact the reporter on this story: Mathew Carr in London at m.carr@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Lars Paulsson at lpaulsson@bloomberg.net Continue reading
China’s National Carbon Credit Exchange Likely Delayed To 2016-2020
More time is needed for the nation’s seven pilot exchanges to build up sufficient data-collection infrastructure and trading rules Friday, 14 June, 2013 David Tang of Tianjin Climate Exchange says China’s carbon bourses need verification of the data they receive. Photo: Dickson Lee The mainland will not be in a position to form a national exchange to trade carbon emission rights until after 2015, according to an official of one of seven pilot exchanges. It will take time for the nation’s seven pilot exchanges to build up sufficient data-collection infrastructure and trading rules, let alone operate smoothly and come up with a model that works nationwide, said David Tang Yue-tan, secretary of the board of Tianjin Climate Exchange. “China has committed to developing many different carbon markets over the next three years, and hopefully a national market sometime between 2016 and 2020,” he told a climate-change investor forum. “In the past, rumours had it that that a national market could be up and running by 2015. But, I can assure you, that is just not feasible.” Besides having good data, the exchanges would also need reliable and independent verification of the information submitted, he said, adding that a certain degree of liquidity was necessary for efficient price discovery, which meant that financial intermediaries would be enlisted. China has not signed binding international agreements on carbon emission reduction. It has said it would aim to reduce its energy intensity by 17 per cent between 2011 and 2015. Intensity is measured by emission per unit of gross domestic product. In late 2011, Beijing ordered carbon exchanges be set up in pilot form. There was to be one in each of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Chongqing, as well as the provinces of Guangdong and Hubei, by the end of 2013. On Tuesday, the Shenzhen one will become the first to start operating. Tang said Tianjin was in the middle of the pack in terms of preparedness to launch. Each of the exchanges will identify industries to be subject to emission quotas. Polluters that emit less than their quota will receive credits that they can sell on one of the exchanges to those which exceed theirs. Such “cap and trade” market systems have been operating abroad for decades and are believed to be the most efficient way to allocate responsibility and reduce pollution. Since polluting heavy industry forms a bigger portion of Tianjin’s economy than “post-industrialised” cities like Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen, Tang said it held the advantage of being able to jostle for a key role in any national carbon exchange. “Our target is to become the backbone of the national exchange,” he told the Post on the sidelines of the conference. “Our industry structure is more suited to cap-and-trade, since it is more cost efficient to subject larger polluters to emission caps than small ones.” Tianjin has identified more than 100 firms in industries including power generation, oil, and steel as targets for the trade. Tang said China’s unique situation – including its state energy pricing that does not allow emission costs to be easily passed on to end users – meant it should adopt flexible emission caps. This would allow it to avoid what happened in Europe: carbon credit prices plunged when recession hit. Continue reading
Future Points To Carbon Trading
China Daily, June 14, 2013 Smoke billows from a factory in Dezhou, Shandong province. To reach mandatory efficiency goals, the government had to take some extreme steps, including power cuts and limits on electricity supply in 2010. [China Daily] Chinese companies that have long faced relatively low environmental costs will have to figure out efficient ways to cut carbon dioxide emissions as a market mechanism is right around the corner. The country’s first pilot carbon-trading program for cutting greenhouse gas emissions will make its formal debut on Tuesday in Shenzhen, the southern city in Guangdong province that has long been a leader in China’s reforms. The Shenzhen pilot program is expected to hasten the launch of pilots in other regions. The central government has designated four other cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, and two provinces to roll out pilot carbon-trading programs by 2014. In Shenzhen, about 635 companies accounted for about 38 percent of the city’s total emissions, and they will be included in the experimental program. Using a 2012 baseline of carbon dioxide emissions of roughly 31.73 million tons, Shenzhen will issue 100 million tons of free emissions allowances to companies complying with the program between 2013 and 2015. Rather than copy cap-and-trade programs in Europe or California, the Shenzhen pilot sets limits on carbon intensity (carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP) for emitters. The 635 companies must achieve an average annual carbon intensity reduction of 6.68 percent by 2015. However, regions will explore various approaches in establishing their own experimental programs. Cities such as Beijing might adopt absolute emission caps, said industrial experts. Carbon intensity “Adopting a carbon intensity index is in line with China’s commitment of reducing carbon intensity,” said Yang Fuqiang, senior adviser on energy, environment and climate change for the Natural Resources Defense Council in Beijing. China has set a target of reducing carbon intensity by 40 to 45 percent by 2020, compared with the 2005 levels. Carbon intensity reduction leaves room for growth by allowing a limited increase of carbon emissions, said Yang. “All approaches could be used, but the final target is to have a nationwide market, and some kind of top-level programs should be put in place,” said Yang. Most international carbon markets adopt absolute caps, but it still remains uncertain when China will reach an absolute peak in emissions. Before the two-week climate change talks in Bonn in early June, the peak issue was already in the limelight. Some media reports said China’s greenhouse gas emissions might peak before 2025 and the country might introduce a cap in 2016. Reports about an early cap were dismissed by Su Wei, China’s chief climate negotiator in Bonn, while he reaffirmed China’s commitment to a carbon-intensity target by 2020. The peak issue is part of the agenda for China in its sustainable development, but when it will happen requires more in-depth analysis, said Zhou Dadi, vice-chairman of the National Energy Advisory Committee. Various studies have yielded wide variations for China’s carbon emissions peak, ranging from 2025 to 2040. “The year of 2025, or the period between 2025 and 2030, each has a high probability, but a precondition is China’s energy demand for industrialization, which could peak by 2020, and the country could then enter a post-industrial era,” said Yang. Another key factor is the speed of China’s urbanization. The quicker the process is, the earlier the country’s emissions peak will come, Yang said. Many Shenzhen businesses are willing to experiment with the new mechanism since it could also generate new business opportunities, though some power plants may be reluctant to adopt the new system, said experts who were involved in the design of the program. The cost of environmental degradation has been largely ignored during China’s impressive economic development in recent decades, putting mounting pressure on the government. Environmental costs To reach China’s mandatory efficiency goals, the government had to take some extreme steps, including power cuts and limits on electricity supply in 2010. “A market-based mechanism will surely work better than administrative measures. Companies should internalize environmental costs that were previously taken by the government,” said Tang Renhu, general manager of Beijing-based Sino-Carbon Innovation and Investment Co. To avoid a low price in carbon auctions, regulators in some markets may set a floor price. Prices that are too low reduce companies’ incentive to invest in technology to cut down emissions. But according to experts, the Shenzhen pilot program has yet to set either a floor or a ceiling on carbon prices for auction. For energy-conservation projects, the central government offers a subsidy of 240 yuan ($39) for each ton of coal equivalent saved, while provincial-level governments offer about 60 yuan. Based on that, the reference carbon price is about 100 yuan per ton, said Tang. This number “could be a reference to the market, but the price needs to be decided by the market,” he said. California established its carbon market last November with quarterly auctions of carbon allowances, making it the second-largest carbon market in the world after the EU’s Emission Trading Scheme or ETS. California set a $10 price floor for its first allowance auction in November. The carbon allowances were actually sold at $10.09 a ton. In its second auction in February, the price rose to $13.62 a ton, and the price then hit a record of $14 in the third auction in May. Gary Gero, president of the California-based Climate Action Reserve, said the most affected companies are electric utilities, petroleum refineries and large manufacturing facilities. Most companies will assess the costs of implementing on-site emission reductions relative to the cost of an allowance or offset and then pursue the most cost-effective reduction opportunities. “This is the very point of a cap-and-trade program; it provides the largest amount of emission reductions at the least possible cost, thereby reducing the economic impact on businesses and consumers,” said Gero. This program will result in the shifting of energy production to cleaner fuels and technologies as the program progresses and after the least expensive reductions have been identified and implemented, he added. The problems of the EU’s ETS, the largest player in the global carbon market, are mostly due to two related issues: the excessive allocation of permits and carbon price volatility. Justin Dargin, energy and carbon markets expert at the University of Oxford, said China should not be overly concerned about the success or failure of carbon markets outside its jurisdiction. The reason that China is concerned about the development of carbon markets has mostly to do with transitioning its economy away from an energy-intensive model. The introduction of energy-efficient industrial equipment would also lower China’s aggregate energy consumption. That would help China meet its energy security goals for the medium and longer term. These goals are relatively independent of developments outside of China, said Dargin. Yet, China can learn from other jurisdictions and therefore should pay close attention to the best practices and “lessons learned” elsewhere. Dargin suggested setting a carbon price floor that is high enough to create incentives for industry to invest in clean technology, while at the same time not being too high to hinder industrial competitiveness. The price band should also attempt to minimize volatility as much as possible. Xie Zhenhua, China’s top climate change official, said in April that China will draw lessons from the EU’s ETS, the world’s biggest emissions trading system, which has had a lingering oversupply of carbon allowances and low prices. Challenges ahead Setting standards and building the capacity of China’s carbon market takes time, but the biggest hurdle might be China’s sluggish energy pricing system reform. Whether electricity rates are determined by the market will be a core concern of building a carbon market, said Dargin. “Without a market-determined price, the imposition of a carbon price on power producers would have little impact as power producers are not allowed to pass on costs to end-users and resist absorbing these costs themselves,” he said. Carbon is a product that is closely linked to energy, but China’s energy prices are still mainly controlled by the government. But this year the government has showed signs of accelerating its energy price reforms. The National Development and Reform Commission in March launched a more market-oriented fuel pricing system to better reflect costs. Economists said relatively low inflation levels have provided favorable conditions for energy pricing reform. The healthy development of the carbon market will eventually rely on reform of the energy pricing system, said Tang. “It’s difficult to (do things that) affect vested interests among energy groups, so starting the carbon market could be a force to help accelerate reform in the energy sector, but that also brings major challenges for China’s carbon market,” said Tang. Also, integration among different markets will be a challenge, he said. Local pilot projects may have some limitations such as small trading pools for suppliers and buyers, so the central government should allow them to extend trading with other regions, said experts. Also, potential fraud must be monitored by regulators to ensure that the market has adequate oversight and transparency. As carbon exchanges open in various cities, information security must be monitored and made robust, said Dargin. For instance, regulators shut down the EU’s ETS after hackers stole more than 3 million carbon credits from government and private company accounts. Furthermore, penalties for non-compliance must be clear. What are the penalties if emitters exceed their emissions caps and do not pay the levied fines? This needs to be clearly stated, said Dargin. Continue reading
