Tag Archives: british
Housing associations organisation criticises lack of affordable homes in UK
More British landlords now rent to people on housing benefit with amounts increasing from £4.6 billion in 2006 to £9.3 billion last year, new research shows. According to the study from the National Housing Federation the reason are twofold. Firstly a 42% rise in the overall number of private renters receiving housing benefit since 2008 and secondly the fact that claims in the private rented sector (PRS) are much higher than in the non-profit housing association sector. The research says that it costs £21 a week more to house a family in a PRS home than in a social home at £110 overall in comparison to £89 and points out that over a year this is an additional £1,000 per family being spent at £5,705 in the PRS compared to £4,638 in the social rented sector. In London, the contrast is even starker with PRS payments at £64 per week more than to those in social homes, adding up to £3,300 more each year, according to the NHF which represents independent non-profit housing associations. It says that the lack of affordable housing available means that a wider group of people need housing benefit. Nearly half, 47%, of all families claim housing benefit in the PRS sector are in work, almost double the proportion it was six years ago at 26%. Housing benefit recipients renting privately now earned an average £4,000 more than on six years ago. The NHF believes that the increase in taxpayer’s money being spent on housing benefit would have been better allocated to building more affordable homes. ‘It is madness to spend £9 billion of taxpayers’ money lining the pockets of private landlords, rather than investing in affordable homes,’ said David Orr, NHF chief executive. ‘Housing associations want to build the homes nation needs. By loosening restrictions on existing funding, the Government can free up housing associations to build more affordable housing at better value to the taxpayer and directly address the housing crisis,’ he added. But the National Landlords Association (NLA) said it should not criticise PRS landlords and pointed out that the number letting homes to housing benefit recipients is now falling. ‘Housing benefit is not a subsidy to landlords; it’s a support for tenants to ensure they can pay for their housing. However, the proportion of landlords who let to tenants in receipt of housing benefit has halved over the last five years as benefit levels have not kept up with rents,’ said , Richard Lambert, NLA chief executive officer. ‘The private rented sector has grown as the market responds to the increasing demand for homes, particularly from a growing proportion of tenants whom the social sector and housing associations simply are not able to support in the current circumstances,’ he explained. ‘The private rented sector plays a significant role in providing much needed homes for tenants. What we should all be talking about is the failure of successive governments to adequately allocate its housing budget and to incentivise… Continue reading
Architects set out what needs to be done to improve UK housing market
Housing policy alone is not enough to solve the UK’s housing crisis whose roots are as complex as they are varied, according to architects. The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBS) says that as demand for new homes continues to outstrip supply successive governments have failed to keep up and it believes that the only solution lies in bringing together the public and private sector to promote, enable and finance new homes, and improve the quality of homes. In a new report it points out that high quality design needs to be at the heart of the solution. ‘Without it, we’ll be solving one problem by storing up further challenges for the future,’ it says in a anew analysis report and calls for housing policy to be added to the remit of the National Infrastructure Commission and for future infrastructure schemes to include details of their impact on housing supply. It also calls for the establishment of a Chief Built Environment Adviser and better use of public resources. ‘With interest rates at historic lows, more can be done to use the balance sheets of public and private sector bodies to boost housing supply,’ the report suggests, adding that the cap on Housing Revenue Account receipts should be lifted to allow councils to borrow to build social housing. Other possibilities include central and local governments setting up public sector investment vehicles and a national housing investment bank to issue bonds and ISAs, recycle right to buy receipts and attract long term institutional investment. RIBA believes that local authorities should set up Local Housing Development Funds, with initial capital for investment provided by local authority pension funds. Once such schemes are up and running, they would be able attract secondary institutional investment and the Government should transfer responsibility and resources for housing and planning to local and regional authorities. ‘This transfer needs to be accompanied by greater autonomy over policy setting. The regeneration of housing estates should be based on an approach which makes the most of the strengths of existing communities and addresses the challenges exacerbated by the urban environment such as anti-social behaviour or high rates of obesity,’ the report says. ‘Local leaders should be empowered to shape their local housing market by taking control over requirements for affordable housing, including the tenure composition for new developments such as social rent, affordable rent, living rent, shared ownership, and Starter Homes, based on local housing need, rather than fixed national targets,’ it adds. It also points out that self build and custom build add value to a locality, can be an affordable routes to home ownership, and are valuable as delivery mechanisms for new, high quality homes. It acknowledges that the Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Act and the Housing and Planning Act aim to identify land and provide planning policies to support custom build but says that unless local authorities have sufficient resources they will struggle to implement their duties… Continue reading
Foreign buyers face new 15% extra property tax in certain parts of Vancouver
A new tax for foreign property buyers is being introduced in British Columbia in Canada in an attempt to cool escalating house prices. The 15% foreign buyer tax will come into effect on 02 August 2016 at a time when prices in the province’s capital city Vancouver are escalating. Indeed, the latest global cities index from international real estate firm Knight Frank shows that prices in the city have increased by 17.3% in the mainstream market and by 26.3% in the prime market in the year to March 2016. Policymakers have been looking at ways to cool price inflation in recent months and the new tax will relate to residential purchases in Metro Vancouver, an area that extends from Bowen Island to Maple Ridge/Langley Township. According to Knight Frank, in real terms the new tax will result in an extra $300,000 in property transfer tax based on a property bought for $2 million by a foreign citizen. This figure will rise to $1.5 million for a $10 million home. The latest government data shows foreign buyers, mainly from China, purchased more than $1 billion worth of property in British Colombia between 10 June 2016 and 14 July 2016 of which around 86% was located in the Lower Mainland. The foreign buyer tax will also apply to corporations that purchase residential real estate and the British Columbia Government has the power to examine the citizenship status of directors and the beneficiaries of corporate profits in deciding whether to add taxes. According to the Finance Minister, the resulting revenue from the new tax will be spent on housing affordability projects. However, Knight Frank points out that some loopholes exist and details as to how it will be policed remain unclear. For example, the tax itself relies on buyers self reporting their nationality and providing a social insurance number, backed up by new auditing procedures and penalties. However, as yet it is unclear whether a resident with citizenship could buy a property by proxy for a family member living abroad. ‘There is no doubt that the new law will cool sales volumes and prices as foreign buyers absorb the additional cost implications. It is worth noting that the planned legislation also allows the BC cabinet to alter the foreign tax rate by between 10% and 20% at a later date and expand it to outside the Lower Mainland,’ the firm explains. ‘The legislature was originally recalled to discuss the merits of a tax on vacant homes, whilst the legislation provides an enabling power for such a measure, it is unclear at this stage whether the Government will go ahead with such a move,’ it adds. Vancouver isn’t the only city where policy makers are trying to stem the flow of speculative capital into their local housing market. Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Switzerland and Mexico have all taken steps either by imposing additional taxes or stamp duties, introducing a one off fee or restricting where or what type of property… Continue reading
