Tag Archives: asian
Emerging Markets Have Farther To Fall
Kenneth Rapoza , Contributor INVESTING | 8/20/2013 Emerging Markets Have Farther To Fall Emerging market investors worried about this guy: Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing policy. The market will get a better sense of so-called “tapering” of QE in the FOMC meeting minutes due out on Wednesday. Barclays Capital expects more pain for emerging market equity and bonds, in the meantime. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife) The emerging markets have farther to fall and they can lay the blame on Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve for their sad-sack performance over the last several days. On Tuesday, the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EEM) was trading slightly lower following Monday’s 1.86% drop. Will investors buy on the lows? Of course they will. But is this a market ripe for deeper corrections? It sure is, says Barclays BCS +0.34% Capital analyst Koon Chow in London. Risky assets continue to be weighed down by rising rates in the U.S. Ten year Treasury bonds are now yielding 2.83%. In London trading hours this morning, European equities followed the downbeat tone in Asian markets. Meanwhile, high yielding currencies like the Brazilian real are bearing the brunt in the forex markets. And it’s not over yet. This underperformance is likely to continue as the starting point of Fed tapering nears, said Chow in his daily note to clients today. Right now, all eyes are on the Fed Open Market Committee Meeting (FOMC) minutes coming out on Wednesday. The risk associated with the FOMC minutes is whether the Fed has begun discussing a possible change in its threshold rate for unemployment as a means of continuing its QE program. Remember, Bernanke said that he would not step on the break of quantitative easing until unemployment levels were comfortably below 7%, or at the very least, trending downward. Unemployment has been trending downward, but at a slower pace. Any discussion of a move away from waiting for lower unemployment will likely to be viewed as a dovish surprise by the market and may lead to a near-term rally for global bonds. Equities would also bounce. The noticeable lack of a broad dollar rally, despite the sharp moves against high yield currencies, suggests that the market may already be positioning for such an announcement. One of the problems right now with emerging market investing is fund managers are allocating out of them faster than anyone expected. The positioning in emerging markets is still problematic, said Chow, although arguably slightly less negative in equities than in fixed income where global institutional and retail positions are still large. This would suggest that there can be some asymmetry in emerging markets in the months ahead, with greater risks of disruptive moves in fixed income than in equities. Fund managers do not want to be caught holding the same positions, with the same weighting post-QE as they were during QE. This is driving the bulk of the moves in the market these days. Meanwhile, the investment patterns in developed markets seems different. While in emerging, investors have had asset allocation shifts that look more like “risk reduction”, developed market positioning is suggestive of only the early stages of the great rotation out of fixed income to equities, Barclays’ Chow said. The stock of cumulative retail inflows (as opposed to institutional) to developed market equities since early 2009 is actually negative. But institutional investors have not seen such a radical exit from their emerging equity positions. Since the financial crisis, the cumulative position of retail investment into developed market equity mutual funds is still negative ($239 billion less), but it has been offset by large institutional flow into the market ($364 billion), according to Cambridge, Mass. based fund trackers EPFR Global. EFPR Global data also shows that investment outflow from emerging markets is suggestive of broader risk reduction. Investors in retail funds have nearly completed their exit from emerging. They have also reduced their bond holdings by about 25% from multi-year highs in May. The flows from institutional funds, by contrast, have been “stickier”, said Chow, and sold in moderate amounts of both equities and debt since late May. “Although the institutional investors’ decisions should be more long-term focused and therefore naturally less likely to exit, the fact that they have not reduced their positions significantly is an unhelpful positioning technical and they may need to see a further drop in prices to buy,” Chow said. He expects more volatility, and downside risks. Technically speaking, emerging equity looks better than bonds given the considerably more advanced overall exit by both retail and institutional at this point, Chow said. A look at the assets wealthy investors assumed would return the most for their portfolios this year. Continue reading
House for Sale Eroreco Mandalagan Bacolod GGA VILLAS
4 Bedroom House and Lot for Sale Mandalagan Eroreco area, near Lady of Mercy Hospital & Villa Georgina, Bacolod City. Semi-furnished “move-in-ready” w/ CCTV … Continue reading
Time For Timber? 25-Year Gain Crushes S&P 500
BY CARLA FRIED JUNE 21, 2013 1 0 When it comes to commodities, gold and energy typically bubble up as the go-to ways to add some alternative asset class diversification to a portfolio. Thing is, you’re typically in for a feast or famine experience, depending on global demand (for oil) and the global zeitgeist (for gold). From the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September 2008 through the debt-ceiling debacle in August 2008 the price of gold nearly doubled. Since then, as the Chicken Little trade has lost its appeal amid mending economies, the price of gold is off nearly 25%. With energy, you’re pretty much beholden to the direction of oil prices , which swing around in line with the global economic outlook. Here’s how the Vanguard Energy ETF’s ( VDE ) price chart side by side with the direction of oil prices. Brent Crude Oil Spot Price data by YCharts If you’re intrigued by the idea of adding a commodity sleeve to your portfolio, timber is an often overlooked commodity worth consideration. First off, it’s a renewable resource. Can’t say that about gold or (most) energy. It’s also got a flexible harvesting schedule. You can’t keep corn in the ground if prices soften. A benchmark timber index had an annualized gain of more than 12% from 1987 through 2012, compared to the S&P 500 ’s annual gain of just below 10%. Coming out of the market low in March 2009, the SPDR Gold Share ETF ( GLD ) hasn’t been half as productive an alternative investment as the two largest timber ETFs, Guggenheim Timber ( CUT ), and iShares S&P Global Timber and Forestry ( WOOD ). WOOD data by YCharts Then there’s the Grantham seal of approval to consider. Jeremy Grantham, co-founder of GMO, which manages more than $100 billion for institutional clients, has been an eerily canny long-term seer. He was harping about the tech excess in the 1990s long before bubble talk became fashionable. He was also out in front on suggesting we had a bit of a credit/debt imbalance prior to the 2008 meltdown. The GMO team has long been pounding the table on the diversification and inflation-hedge attributes of timber for years. In GMO’s latest seven-year forecast, the 5.9% projected real return for timber is equaled only by the firm’s outlook for much more volatile emerging market stocks. For perspective, GMO expects run of the mill U.S. small and large caps to register negative returns over the next seven years when adjusted for inflation. High quality U.S. large caps — think excellent ROE and low debt — are expected to fare better, with an annualized 3.7% real return. But that’s still two percentage points less than timber. If you’re looking to rotate out of some profitable investments that look a little long in the tooth these days, timber might be worth a look as a long-term hedge position. To be sure, GMO and other big time institutional clients can invest directly in timber. With timber-focused ETFs you’re of course buying a portfolios of businesses that traffic in timber, in whole or part. For a more direct stake, you can take a look at Real Estate Investment Trusts that own forestland. Weyerhaeuser ( WY ), which converted from a mish-mosh of paper-related business to a full on REIT in 2010, is a major holding in both ETF portfolios. The company just announced it will pay $2.65 billion to buy more land that will increase its Pacific Northwest timber acreage by 33% to more than 6 million acres. (Pacific timber has a faster route to Asian emerging markets than southern timberland.) At the same time, Weyerhaeuser says it’s considering a sale or spinoff of a home-building subsidiary. The net takeaway: it’s doubling down on direct timber ownership and looking to cash out of a main consumer of said timber. Granted a forward PE ratio north of 20 isn’t exactly a bargain, but that’s well below Weyerhaeuser’s recent highs. Management announced it plans to finance the deal by issuing more equity and debt. As a little company research shows, Weyerhaeuser’s debt-to-equity ratio is below 1.00; that makes it far more stable than Plum Creek Timber ( PCL ), but it’s still more leveraged than the other major U.S. timber REIT, Rayonier ( RYN ), which operates in the Southern states. WY Debt to Equity Ratio data by YCharts As with all REITs, at least 90% of income must be distributed to investors. Weyerhaeuser’s current dividend yield is 2.8%. Rayonier’s dividend yield is at 3.3%. Carla Fried, a senior contributing editor at ycharts.com, has covered investing for more than 25 years. Her work appears in The New York Times, Bloomberg.com and Money Magazine. She can be reached at editor@ycharts.com. You can also request a demonstration of YCharts Platinum. – See more at: http://ycharts.com/a…h.wJduGa6w.dpuf Continue reading