Taylor Scott International News
First time buyers and housing associations in the UK could bear the brunt of banking reforms which affect credit risk, it is claimed. Proposals from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to revise its standardised approach for credit risk could adversely affect parts of the UK housing market, according to the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association (IMLA). The Basel framework ensures that banks, building societies and other deposit taking institutions have sufficient capital for the underlying risks they bear. While supporting this objective, the IMLA has raised significant concerns over some proposed revisions in the latest Basel consultation, which it argues are not justified by differences in risk and could limit access to mortgage finance in key areas of the UK housing market. In particular, one of the most serious impacts could be on lending to UK housing associations. By preventing lenders from taking into account borrowers’ financial strength, the Basel proposals could see loans to many housing associations redefined and subject to much higher capital requirements, despite the exemplary payment track record and their government regulated status. The same proposals mean the regulatory cost of buy to let lending could far outweigh the risks involved, as they do not accommodate the fact that many buy to let borrowers are substantially more financially secure than the average owner occupier. IMLA also strongly disagrees with proposals which could distort mortgage pricing and push up the cost of higher loan to value (LTV) mortgages, which are relied on by many first time buyers to become home owners. Doing so could incentivise them to seek out unsecured ‘top up’ loans to fund their house purchases with a lower LTV mortgage, which would be potentially harmful to their finances. The IMLA’s consultation response highlights how aspects of the Basel proposals could create a ‘bizarre’ situation where unsecured lending can be given a lower risk weighting than secured lending to the same borrower. It could also penalise lenders that have adopted conservative lending standards and create an artificial incentive to lenders to remortgage or ‘churn’ customers, creating outcomes that would not be deemed good for either the customer or the lender. ‘It is vital to have the right checks and balances in place so lenders can provide mortgage finance where there is a legitimate need while maintaining a stable UK housing market,’ said Peter Williams, IMLA executive director. ‘The Basel consultation sets out with the important aim of ensuring capital requirements are appropriate to the underlying risk, but we are concerned that the current proposals will not meet this goal,’ he explained. ‘Government and industry need to work together to bring greater balance to the UK housing market. This includes ironing out the technical details of the Basel proposals to defend consumer interests across all housing tenures,’ he added. Taylor Scott International
Taylor Scott International, Taylor Scott
