Taylor Scott International News
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7bb3efaa-1c85-11e3-a8a3-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2f3XJ2xx3 By Paul J Davies Markets are awash with buzzwords. Ever since Brics was coined we have recoiled from PIIGS, grappled with Chimerica and been sceptical about both Abenomics and Liconomics. So here is an aide memoire for where to invest when the US Federal Reserve threatens to taper its ultra-loose monetary policy and emerging markets sag with a draining of vital liquidity. When the markets correct, go “Korexico”. South Korea and Mexico have been two of the best defensive stories around in emerging markets in recent months for a handful of simple reasons: their exports are geared towards a US recovery, they did not suck in the hot money unleashed by central banks and they have not seen credit booms in the past two years. Stock markets in both countries suffered with the rest after Fed chairman Ben Bernanke first talked of “tapering” on May 22. However, they did not fall as far and they recovered more strongly. Stocks in Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines fell deeply into late June and have not enjoyed a big bounce from the recent weaker US economic data that may have put off the end of “quantitative easing”. Korea’s Kospi index fell 11 per cent at worst by the last week of June and is now back to where it was in late May. Mexico did not even drop that far, losing only about 6 per cent at most. Now it is up 1.5 per cent. The other four were down between 15 and 24 per cent at worst. Brazil’s Bovespa is still 5.5 per cent lower since late May, while Bangkok’s SET, Jakarta’s JCI and the PCOMP in Manila are all down about 17 per cent. Part of the story is in fund flows. Both Korea and Mexico suffered outflows from equity markets at first, but not for long. Mexican markets saw almost $4bn of foreign cash leave stock markets in June, but more than $2bn return in July and August. In Korea, where data are published daily, inflows of more than $7bn since the end of June have more than replaced the outflows of $6.6bn during June. What is more, according to Freya Beamish at Lombard Street Research in Hong Kong, money that came out of Korean equities did not leave the country. “When the taper hysteria first hit, foreigners pulled out of Korean equities in the same way as they did across Asia,” she says. “But they went into Korean bonds. Then when the taper concerns eased foreigners went back into equities.” So what has kept these markets attractive and is the defensive story justified? Both have avoided the hot money problem of other emerging markets to a great degree. On the credit side, bank lending to GDP in Korea may look high at 86.5 per cent, but it is lower than many Asian neighbours and has declined a few points since 2009. Other Asian markets have seen explosive credit growth. In Mexico, the ratio has barely moved, remaining at about 20 per cent of GDP. Their stock markets attracted less hot cash, too, especially compared with the dizzying highs reached by the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia. Korea and Mexico are both exposed to a US recovery via exports. More than two-thirds of Mexico’s exports head north across the border, but only about 10 per cent of Korea’s go to the US. But while Korea is much more dependent on China in general for exports, its key industries of electronics and cars are more influenced by US buying than Chinese. A boon for Korea has been Japan. The yen’s recent depreciation was meant to hit Korea’s competitiveness – but that has not happened. Oddly, a boon for Korea has been Japan. The yen’s recent depreciation was meant to hit Korea’s competitiveness – but that has not happened. “At the corporate level, there had been a concern about renewed competition from Japan benefiting from a weaker yen, but Japanese companies have focused on restoring profitability not boosting sales,” says Jeff Shen, head of emerging markets at BlackRock. But it is not entirely rosy. For a start, first-half earnings were a big disappointment. According to Citigroup, almost half of Korean companies missed analyst estimates and less than 20 per cent beat them – the worst in Asia. In Mexico, again half of companies missed forecasts, but fewer than one-in-ten beat them, the worst in Latin America. In Korea, investors were not expecting great things. The Kospi trades on 8-times forward earnings, one of the cheapest in Asia and below its average over the past 10 years, according to JPMorgan. Mexico, however, is one of the most expensive markets in the world on 17 times forward earnings, a good way above its average. This could well prove a dangerous place to be. For both countries, a sustained US recovery is what will really help – and that is far from certain. Their key attraction in the months ahead is more likely to be as a short-term haven from bouts of taper-hysteria in other emerging markets. Korexico is less a destination than a hide-out. paul.j.davies@ft.com Taylor Scott International
Taylor Scott International, Taylor Scott
