Fund Review: BGF World Agriculture fund

ivestock investment boosts short-term performance By Nyree Stewart | Published Jul 01, 2013 A recent short-term performance boost for the $294m (£187.1m) BGF World Agriculture fund is a result of a move towards more downstream areas of the agriculture sector, such as livestock, in the past six months. However, the fund’s performance has lagged its benchmark in the year to date. The Luxembourg-domiciled fund, co-managed by Desmond Cheung and Richard Davis, targets agriculture sector growth but specifically focuses on capturing what farmers are doing at any one point in the cycle. Mr Cheung explains: “Some of our competitors would expand quite a bit further away into the food sector, but while we have a little bit of food sector exposure in this fund, it is mainly due to the fact they have direct relationships or dealings with the farmers. So we don’t generally buy into companies such as Wal-Mart even though obviously it is in the food supply chain.” Process The fund’s investment process is primarily bottom-up, with Mr Cheung noting the key underlying driver is stock selection based on valuation, with a three- to five-year view on the company. But he adds: “Obviously, this is quite a cyclical sector, so we have to include a top-down overlay to determine which part of the cycle we are in. We try to incorporate the two and come to a conclusion on the recommendations on each of the names and the size of the position within the fund.” The fund is also not constrained by the market cap of companies available within the agriculture sector, and currently has roughly 10 per cent of the fund allocated to small caps, with a further 30 per cent weighting in medium-sized businesses. Performance Since launch in March 2010, the sterling-hedged share class of the fund has returned 15.81 per cent to June 10 2013, compared with a 24.92 per cent return from the benchmark FSE DAXglobal Agribusiness TR USD, according to Morningstar. However, on a discrete-year basis, the fund’s sterling share class significantly outperformed the index in 2012, with a return of 11.49 per cent compared with the benchmark return of 8.32 per cent. The manager points out the fund has not excluded any parts of the agriculture sector, so while some may have the perception the universe consists solely of seed or fertiliser or equipment companies – areas that are fairly consolidated – this is not the case. “The way we classify or define the agriculture sector is little bit wider. On one side you have arable farmers, which are those growing crops such as corn, wheat and soya beans and so those would be captured more under the seed, chemicals, equipment or fertiliser companies. But then other parts of the farming world that have been neglected in the past three years are the livestock sectors. When corn or soya bean prices rallied in the past couple of years, those are effectively the input costs that go into the production of meat, so they’ve been suffering from the high rises in crop prices.” Taylor Scott International